Logo-hpp
2022: Two-year Impact Factor: 4.4
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2022): 5.3
SNIP(2022):1.389
SJR(2022): 0.78
Platinum
Open Access

Health Promot Perspect. 2023;13(1): 21-35.
doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.03
PMID: 37309435
PMCID: PMC10257562
Scopus ID: 85160024294
  Abstract View: 554
  PDF Download: 456
  Full Text View: 117

Systematic Review

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A Systematic review of cognitive determinants

Sara Pourrazavi 1,2 ORCID logo, Zahra Fathifar 3, Manoj Sharma 4,5 ORCID logo, Hamid Allahverdipour 1,2* ORCID logo

1 Research Center of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Health Education & Promotion Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Library, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Department of Social and Behavioral Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA
5 Department of Internal Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA
*Corresponding Author: Hamid Allahverdipour, Email: allahverdipourh@tbzmed.ac.ir

Abstract

Background: Although mass vaccination is considered one of the most effective public health strategies during the pandemic, in the COVID-19 era, many people considered vaccines unnecessary and, or doubted the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine. This review aimed to tabulate cognitive causes of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy, which may help public health policymakers overcome the barriers to mass vaccinations in future pandemics.

Methods: For this systematic review, studies pertaining to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy published up to June 2022 were retrieved from six online databases (Cochrane Library, Google Scholar Medline through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Inclusion criteria were the studies conducted on people who had a delay in accepting or refusing COVID-19 vaccines, reported the impact of cognitive determinants on vaccine hesitancy, and were written in English in the timeframe of 2020–2022.

Results: This systematic review initially reviewed 1171 records. From these 91 articles met the inclusion criteria. The vaccination hesitation rate was 29.72% on average. This systematic review identified several cognitive determinants influencing vaccination hesitancy. Lack of confidence and complacency were the most frequent factors that predicted vaccine hesitancy.

Conclusion: The identified prevailing cognitive determinants for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy indicated that using initiative and effective communication strategies would be a determinant factor in building people’s trust in vaccines during the pandemic and mass vaccinations.

First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 555

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 456

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 117

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 24 Mar 2023
Revision: 26 Mar 2023
Accepted: 27 Mar 2023
ePublished: 30 Apr 2023
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)