Author Guidelines
Updated November 2020
Submissions to HPP are accepted through our
online submission system. To streamline the process, the online submission
system is designed to perform a series of automatic controls, promptly informing
the user of any technical insufficiencies, and directing to the relevant
instructions.
To start submission, please create an account and log in. The submitting
author will take responsibility on behalf of all co-authors as the corresponding
author of the submission, and is required to enter full details including a
working e-mail address, phone number and address, in their online profile. All
correspondence, including, but not limited to, the results of initial
evaluation, Editor’s decision, and request for revisions or proofreading will be
sent to the e-mail address of the corresponding author, which will be published
with the article.
The submission or any subsequent revision is evaluated at the editorial
office. If corrections are necessary, it may be temporarily unsubmitted and
returned to the authors, who are responsible for formatting their submission and
providing the required information. Please see our editorial workflow for more
information. For further help regarding submission, you may contact the
editorial office.
We use iThenticate software in the processing of the submissions.

1. The conditions of submission
Open-access license, copyright, and charges
Upon submission, the authors are required to sign an exclusive license form
for open access publication of their work in the journal under the Creative
Commons license 4.0 (CC-BY). The authors retain the copyright to their work.
Please see our open access and copyright policy and license agreement for more information.
Currently, there are no submission or publication charges applicable to the
articles submitted to or published in HPP, the open
access publication of which is supported by Tabriz University of Medical
Sciences Department of Vice Chancellor for Research. Please see our open access and copyright policy for more information.
Cover letter
A cover letter is required for every submission. The authors will need to
confirm the following conditions in the submission cover letter:
- That the submission is original, submitted solely to this journal, and not currently under consideration for publication or already published elsewhere unless explained in the submission cover letter. See our editorial policies on duplicate publication.
- That no sentence is copied from other sources, see our editorial policies on plagiarism and text recycling.
- That the submitting author takes responsibility for the submission on behalf
of all authors as the corresponding author.
- That all authors have reviewed, approved, and consented to the submission,
and they are accountable for all aspects of its accuracy and integrity in
accordance with ICMJE criteria.
The submission cover letter should also include the following information, as
well as any additional information requested in the instructions for the
specific article type that the authors are submitting:
- An explanation of why the submitted work should be published in the journal
(the novelty of the work).
- An explanation of any issues relating to journal policies.
- A declaration of any potential competing interests.
- The name of the particular special issue that the submission should be published
in.
The authors may also suggest potential peer reviewers for their submission by
providing name, institutional email addresses, and an ORCID or Scopus ID. Please
see our editorial policies for more information on suggesting peer reviewers. Please also see
our editorial policies regarding the use of unique identifiers.
The authors may also provide the details of anyone who they would prefer not
to review their work.
Intentionally providing falsifying information, such as false names or email
addresses will result in rejection of the submission and may lead to further
investigation in line with our misconduct policy.
Title page
The title page should include the manuscript title, authors' full names and affiliations, corresponding author's name and affiliation.
2. Preparing the submission
Preparing the manuscript
For general instructions, please see preparing the manuscript. HPP publishes these article
types:
- Research article: Original work resulting from
research, constituting complete studies that contain all relevant information.
Including systematic review and meta-analysis. Prepare the manuscript as
follows: A Title, a Structured Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methods,
Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References, Tables, Figures, and List of
additional files.
- Short communication: Original work, but less substantial than the regular research article, presenting preliminary results,
or results of immediate relevance. Prepare the manuscript as follows: A Title, a
Structured Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion,
Conclusion, References, Tables, Figures, and List of additional files.
- Review: Narrative reviews on clinically relevant topics. Prepare the manuscript as follows: A Title, an Unstructured
Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Subheadings in the manuscript as necessary,
Discussion, Conclusion, References, Tables, Figures, List of additional files.
- Case report: Systematic reports of interesting or rare cases of importance for the practice of professionals. Prepare the
manuscript as follows: A Title, an Unstructured Abstract, Keywords,
Introduction, Case Report, Discussion, Conclusion, References, Tables, Figures, and List of additional files.
- Letter: Comments or concerns on specific subjects; overall or about items published in the journal. Also, new or additional findings of original nature. Prepare the letter as follows: A Title,
Text References.
- Editorial: The Journal’s editors write the
editorial.
Title
A concise, descriptive title should be chosen for the submission. Do not
capitalize all words; only the first word and proper nouns should be
capitalized. Include the type of the study (meta-analysis, systematic review,
cohort, case report, etc.) in the title with a colon (:).
Abstract
The structured abstract (maximum 250 words) is to contain the following major
subheadings: Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusion. The Background
subheading reflects the background as well as the purpose of the study, that is,
the hypothesis being tested. The Methods should include the setting for the
study, the subjects (number and type), the treatment or intervention, and the
type of statistical analysis. The Results include the outcome of the study and
statistical significance if appropriate. The Conclusion states the significance
of the results. Clinical trials should include the trial registration number on
the last line of the abstract.
The unstructured abstract (maximum 150 words) does not contain subheadings.
Keywords
Three to 10 keywords for each submission should be selected from the list of
MESH words. List keywords in alphabetic order, all lower case, except where
necessary.
Introduction
The introduction contains a concise review of the subject area and the
rationale for the study. More detailed comparisons to previous work and
conclusions of the study appear in the Discussion section.
Methods
The methods section should describe in adequate detail the experimental
subjects, their important characteristics, and the methods, apparatus, and
procedures used so that other researchers can reproduce the experiment.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether
the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the
responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and
with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. If doubt exists
whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration,
the authors must explain the rationale for their approach and demonstrate that
the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the
study. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should indicate whether
the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals
was followed.
The methods section must indicate that the protocol was reviewed by the
appropriate institutional review body and that each subject in the project
signed a detailed informed consent form.
Results
Results should be presented in a logical sequence about tables,
figures and illustrations as appropriate.
Discussion
New and possible findings of the study should be emphasized, as well as any
conclusions that can be drawn. The discussion should compare the present data to
previous findings. Limitations of the experimental methods should be indicated,
as should implications for future research. New hypotheses and clinical
recommendations are appropriate and should be clearly identified.
Recommendations, particularly clinical ones, may be included when
appropriate.
Preparing references, equations, tables, figures, and additional
files
To correctly prepare the references, equations, tables, figures, or
additional files for a submission, please follow these guidelines:
- For instructions on formatting the citations of the submission, please see
preparing references.
- For correct formatting of formulas, please see preparing formulas or equations.
- Smaller tables that are considered integral to the manuscript can be pasted at the end of the manuscript file in A4 portrait or landscape format. Please see preparing tables for more instructions.
- Figures must be submitted after tables in the main manuscript file in a proper format (and also embedded in the manuscript to expedite the review process). Please see preparing figures for more instructions.
- Datasets, videos, or other information must be submitted separately as additional files, which will be published along with the article.
Please see preparing additional files for more instructions.
3. Providing the required information
The authors should have the required information below, ready upon submission.
The manuscript should not include this information to ensure a blind
peer-review. Please see our editorial policies for more information regarding peer review policy. The editor will review the supporting
information.
Author information and acknowledgements
Full names and email addresses of all authors, as well as their affiliations
and institutional addresses, are requested during submission. Providing the
unique identifier (ORCID or Scopus ID) of each co-author is optional, but
preferred. Please see our editorial policies on authorship and unique identifiers for more information. If a collaboration group should be listed
as an author, please list the group name as an author.
In an “Authors’ contribution” section, the authors are required to explain
the contribution of each co-author in the conception or design of the work; the
acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; and drafting the
work or revising it critically for important intellectual content.
In an “Acknowledgments” section, the authors are required to acknowledge
anyone who contributed to the submitted work who does not meet the criteria for
authorship. It is obligatory to state any support with translating or editing by
third parties such as professional commercial writing/editing services. The
authors should obtain permission to acknowledge all those mentioned in the
Acknowledgments section.
Please see our editorial policies for further explanation of authorship criteria and acknowledgements.
Funding
The authors are required to declare all sources of funding for the research
reported. The role of the funding body in the design of the study and
collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript
should be declared.
Disclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Relationships and Activities
The authors are required to declare all financial and non-financial relationships and activities with regards to the publication of their work during submission.
Please see our editorial policies for more information on financial and non-financial relationships and activities. If any of the authors
are unsure whether they have financial and non-financial relationships and activities, they should contact the
editorial office.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Authors of submissions reporting studies involving human participants, human
data or human tissues are required to provide the following information:
- A statement on ethics approval and consent (even where the need for approval
was waived).
- The name of the ethics committee that approved the study and the committee’s
reference number if appropriate.
Submissions reporting studies involving animals must include a statement on
ethics approval.
Please see our editorial policies for more information.
If the submission does not report on or involve the use of any animals or
human data or tissues, please state “Not applicable” in this section.
Consent to publish
If the submission contains any person’s data in any form, consent
to publish must be obtained from that person, or in the case of children, their
parent or legal guardian. All presentations of case reports must have consented to
publish. The authors may use their institutional consent form. The form is not
to be sent on submission, but we may request to see a copy at any stage
(including after publication).
Please see our editorial policies for more information.
If the submission does not contain any person’s data, please state
“Not applicable” in this section.
4. Finalizing submission
Before completing the process, the submitting author is required to review
the submission proof (PDF), which will be automatically generated. The submission
proof may be shared with co-authors for a final check and approval. The
submitting author may go back and correct any parts as necessary, review the
submission proof again, and then submit the work using the “Submit” button.
5. Revising the submission
Any subsequent revisions to the submission upon request from the editor will
have to follow the same guidelines presented here.
Upon submitting a revised submission, the authors will be guided to provide a
re-submission letter, attaching the revision details, based on the comments
provided by the editor. The attached revision details should not include author
information to ensure blind peer review.
6. Author Contributions
According to the “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals”, those individuals claiming authorship should meet all 4 of the following conditions:
1. Contributed substantially to the conception and design of the study, the acquisition of data, or the analysis and interpretation
2. Drafted or provided critical revision of the article
3. Provided final approval of the version to publish
4. Agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved
Each author should have participated sufficiently in work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content.
Ghost-writing is NOT acceptable. Contributors who do not meet the abovementioned criteria for authorship should be listed in the acknowledgement.
Groups of persons who have contributed materially to the paper, but whose contributions do not justify authorship may be listed under a heading such as “clinical investigators” or “participating investigators,” and their function or contribution should be described; for example, “served as scientific advisors,” “critically reviewed the study proposal.”]
If you have any question about this, contact that editorial office before submitting your manuscript at hpp@tbzmed.ac.ir or +98413-337-41-90.
Author Contribution Details
Contributors should describe contributions made by each of them towards the manuscript. The description should be divided in following categories, as applicable: concept, design, the definition of intellectual content, literature search, clinical studies, experimental studies, data acquisition, data analysis, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing and manuscript review. Authors' contributions will be printed along with the article.
Example:
HA involved in the conception and designing the study. MAJ performed data analysis and interpretation. HN wrote the manuscript and acted as the corresponding author. HA and ID supervised the development of work, helped in data interpretation and manuscript evaluation. HN helped to evaluate and edit the manuscript.
Audio-Visual Souses
The recommended format for audio-visual souses for HPP journal is provided via:
http://guides.library.uwa.edu.au/c.php?g=324981&p=2178446