Logo-hpp
2023: Two-year Impact Factor: 2.4
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2023):7.1
 
Platinum
Open Access

Health Promot Perspect. 2019;9(4): 270-278.
doi: 10.15171/hpp.2019.37
PMID: 31777706
PMCID: PMC6875554
Scopus ID: 85077653791
  Abstract View: 2448
  PDF Download: 1655
  Full Text View: 982

Original Article

Optimizing college health promotion in the digital age: Comparing perceived well-being, health behaviors, health education needs and preferences between college students enrolled in fully online versus campus-based programs

Michelle M. Burcin 1*, Shelley N. Armstrong 1, Jody O. Early 2 ORCID logo, Holly Godwin 1

1 Walden University School of Health Sciences, Minneapolis, MN, USA
2 University of Washington Bothell, School of Nursing and Health Studies, Bothell, WA, USA
*Corresponding Author: Email: michelle.burcin@mail.waldenu.edu

Abstract

Background: There is little published about non-traditional and online college students’ health and well-being. College health services must evolve to address the needs of this growing population. The purpose of this study was to explore risk factors, perceived well-being, health behaviors, and health education preferences of US college students enrolled in a fully online academic programs compared to a national sample of college students enrolled in campus based programs.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included a volunteer sample of 961 college students enrolled in two large, U.S. accredited online universities. Participants completed an online survey that included questions and sub scales from the National College Health Assessment (NCHA, IIb). Responses on survey items from student learning online were compared to an equal sample of college students enrolled in non-online programs, randomly drawn from the NCHA IIb national data set (n = 961). Frequencies on survey items were calculated and mean scores of subset measures for online students were compared against those from the NCHA data set using two tailed z-test scores and independent sample t-tests with alpha at 0.05.

Results: Online students reported significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher percentages of chronic illnesses, psychiatric conditions, mobility disabilities, deafness/hearing loss, speech/language disorders,cigarette use, obesity, sedentary activity, and depression than the NCHA national sample.

Implication for Practice: Health professionals and leaders who work in higher education must consider the shifting landscape and demographics in higher education in order to develop more tailored, innovative digital health promotion approaches that effectively reach the growing population of online, commuter, and older learners.


Citation: Burcin MM, Armstrong SN, Early JO, Godwin H. Optimizing college health promotion in the digital age: Comparing perceived well-being, health behaviors, health education needs and preferences between college students enrolled in fully online versus campus-based programs. Health Promot Perspect. 2019;9(4):270-278. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2019.37.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 2449

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 1655

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 982

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 27 Jan 2019
Accepted: 22 Aug 2019
ePublished: 24 Oct 2019
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)