Logo-hpp
2023: Two-year Impact Factor: 2.4
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2023):7.1
 
Platinum
Open Access

Health Promotion Perspectives. 12(2):218-225. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2022.27

Original Article

Psycho-behavioral predictors of uncontrolled blood pressure: A case-control study

Zeinab Javadivala 1ORCID logo, Akbar Ranjbarkhah 2, Asghar Mohammadpoorasl 3ORCID logo, Farhad Shekari 3, Devender Bhalla 4, Neda Gilani 3, 5, *ORCID logo
1Department of Health Education & Promotion, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2Member of the Student Research Committee, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4Ple Universitaire Euclide Intergovernmental UN Treaty 49006/49007, Bangui, Central African Republic
5Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Neda Gilani, Email: gilanin@tbzmed.ac.ir

Abstract

Background: We aimed to determine the role of demographic, lifestyle, and personality trait factors in predicting control of blood pressure (BP) among patients with hypertension (HTN) in West Azerbaijan, Iran.

Methods: In this case control study we recruited participants from all primary health centers of Salmas city; who were at least 18 years of age, had a HTN diagnosis during the previous six months, and had a mandatory household record. Of 490 random subjects approached, 441 (84.2%) fulfilled our inclusion criteria (case: 221; control: 220). The age-matched controls were recruited from the same source population and were required to have controlled HTN. Data were collected through demographic Checklist, Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).

Results: Upon multivariate analyses, factors related to personality traits subdomains including extraversion personality (odd ratio [OR]: 0.85; CI: 0.73, 0.97) was effective in control of BP. Factors related to uncontrolled BP were agreement and consciences subdomains (OR 1.26 [CI: 1.07, 1.48] and OR 1.21 [CI: 1. 02, 1.44]), rare fruit consumption (OR 5.95 [CI: 1.24, 12.1]), Grade 1 and 2 obesities (OR 2.29 [CI: 1.28, 4.09] and OR 7.11 [CI: 2.21, 12.52]) and smoking (OR 3.27 [CI: 1.56, 6.89]).

Conclusion: In addition to regular physical activity and fruit consumption and quitting smoking; personality traits such as Agreement and conscience personality traits were predictive of HTN control. We believe our work provides the required knowledge to design comprehensive HTN prevention programs by taking into account the multi-level causality approach.

Keywords: Prediction, Blood pressure, Hypertension, Case-Control, Epidemiology

Copyright

© 2022 The Author(s).
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Introduction

Hypertension (HTN) is a major, independent, and progressive but a preventable disease condition. It is also an important risk factor for other disease conditions, and has been connected with a large assortment of morbidities world over.1 For instance, coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease, cognitive impairment, and wound healing are associated to the disease. HTN is also the leading single contributor to all-cause mortality and disability worldwide, with about four million deaths every year and one in every eight deaths worldwide.1 About half of the world’s adult population is likely to have non-optimal (i.e., >110–115 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure (BP) levels.2 The importance of HTN can be further understood from a simple example that a mere ten-point increase in the diastolic pressure above 115/75 mm Hg can double the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disorders such as stroke.1 Therefore, better understanding of its prevention, control, and adequate mitigation is key in promoting health and well-being in world’s population.

HTN is often projected as a prerogative of the aged population, but, the relationship between BP and age is graded and continuous over one’s life course. For example, age is a proxy of the probability and duration of exposure to numerous factors that increase BP gradually over time, such as excess sodium intake, gain of weight and obesity, alcohol intake, physical inactivity, etc. Others have also shown that atherosclerotic factors are more important than the level of BP alone, since such persons are more likely to derive benefits from interventions.3 Beside these factors, there are other important risk factors, for instance, the prevalence of HTN and its consequences are greatest in those with lower socioeconomic status and urban dwellers; a phenomenon seen in both within and between countries.4 In the last decade, social, mental, and economic changes in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle Eastern countries have contributed to a surge of many cardiovascular risk factors, including HTN.5

Unfortunately, despite a grave epidemiological profile for HTN, there remains laxity in patient’s attitudes towards HTN. For instance, in Saudi Arabia, merely 6.2% subjects maintain high adherence to anti-HTN medications6 and many people may find hard to accept that HTN may lead to serious consequences.7 In Iran, studies show8 that the frequency of HTN awareness is merely about 46.0%. The role of patients is more decisive in Middle-Eastern societies, where people tend to retain their strong ethnic identity, and tend to integrate religion and find Islamic values in treatment modalities, which in turn affect their attitude and help-seeking practices.9 Another reason behind the patient’s lax attitude towards HTN could be related to one’s personality traits. For instance, personality factors are likely to be associated with incidence and clinical diagnosis of HTN,10 as well as with adherence to treatment in patients with chronic conditions.10,11 The importance of patient-level factors and patient’s own role in the management of HTN can also be understood from the definition of adherence, which is the extent to which a person’s behaviour- taking medication, following a diet, and/or executing lifestyle changes, corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider.

Although many studies have explored factors in cross-sectional designs10 but, the predictive value of risk and protective factors can only be determined thru’ case-control designs. So, the primary objective was to determine the role of demographic, lifestyle, and personality trait factors in predicting the control of BP among patients with arterial hypertension in West Azerbaijan, Iran.


Materials and Methods

Design and participants

In this case control study we recruited our participants from all primary health centers of Salmas, West Azerbaijan. Salmas is located northwest of Lake Urmia, near Turkey from March to August, 2019. It has a population of about 127 864. The ethnic identity of the population is mainly Azerbaijanis and Kurds. For this study, the participants were required to have a formal diagnosis of HTN made anytime during the previous six calendar months, irrespective of their current anti-hypertensive treatment status. Uncontrolled HTN was defined as an “average arterial BP measured at the time of clinic visit to be ≥140/90 mm Hg in patients on treatment (at least one anti-hypertensive for minimum two weeks)”.12,13 Other inclusion criteria for our study were that the participants be at least 18 years of age and have a household health record in any of the primary health centers of Salmas. Those with diabetes and/or cognitive disorders were excluded from the study. In Iran, the federal government has established health centers throughout the country. These centers are required to maintain a mandatory household file for each household under their respective catchment area. The health centers are run by a general physician and health technicians. The health centers monitor and guide health houses, and provide out-patient care and referral to the district hospitals.

Sampling

The sample size was determined based on the findings related to BMI of two groups of controlled BP and uncontrolled BP of the study by Arabzadeh et al.14 By considering these indices; 95% confidence level, and power of 80%, sample size was calculated at 147 per each groups by G-Power 3.1.2 software15 (available at: https://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower). Considering a design effect of 1.5 and a dropout rate of 10%, the final sample size was determined to be 245 subjects for each group. For this study, we approached a random sample of 490 subjects for inclusion; of which, 441 (84.2%) subjects fulfilled our inclusion criteria and consented as well to participate (case: 221, control: 220). Initially, all subjects were contacted over telephone to check their eligibility and interest to participate, as well as for inviting them to come to the nearest health center for formal clinical assessment and data collection. The age-matched controls (n= 220) were recruited from the same source population and were required to have controlled HTN, i.e. an average arterial BP of <140/90 mm Hg at the clinic visit in patients on treatment (at least one anti-hypertensive for minimum two weeks).

Data collection

Data were collected by administering a demographic Checklist, Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Furthermore, patients’ BP, waist circumference (WC), weight, and body mass index (BMI) were also recorded. BP was measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer, twice in the same arm, after the participant had been seated at rest for 10–15 minutes. The systolic and diastolic BP measurements were the mean of the two readings. WC was evaluated using a measuring tape to the nearest 0.1 cm. The weight of an individual dressed in light clothing without shoes was recorded each time using a calibrated scale to the nearest 0.1 kg. Height was measured without shoes using a stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm.

Ten-Item Personality Inventory

TIPI16 is a very short measure of the Big Five personality traits (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and emotional stability). Each personality dimension is measured by two items. All items are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly agree). The total score may range between 10 and 70. Higher scores indicated better personality traits. TIPI has been validated in Iranian population and is found to have adequate validity and reliability.17 The content and face validity of the TIPI were assessed qualitatively by panel of 10 experts. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.85, indicating good internal consistency for TIPI.

International Physical Activity Questionnaire

The Persian version of IPAQ was used to measure regular PA.18,19 Information on the time spent on low, moderate and high activities on the basis of METs (Metabolic equivalents)-min/week’s scores or the frequency of activities at week days and time spent on each activity. The calculations of MET’s scores and PA classifications are revealed in the guidelines and other studies.19,20

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata statistical package version 16.21 Data were presented using frequencies and proportion for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for normal numeric variables. Inferential statistics were calculated to compare the characteristics of patients with controlled and uncontrolled HTN. Between-group differences were calculated using Pearson chi-square; and with independent t tests. Univariable logistic regression was used to investigate the unadjusted effect of each variable in prediction of uncontrolled BP. Also, a stepwise multivariable logistic regression of reduced number of predictor variables was performed to build the best logistic regression model of uncontrolled BP (critical level of P < 0.1 for new variable entry and of P ≥ 0.2 for variable removal). The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also calculated from logistic regression analyses. The model assumptions including collinearity (i.e. wide confidence intervals) and the presence of outliers were checked and were not in violation. The fit of the logistic regression model was confirmed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Inferential statistical tests were considered significant when P values were less than 0.05.


Results

Among 441 participants, 310 were females (70.3%) and 131 (29.3%) were males; 210 (40.30%) were <60 and 231 (52.4%) were ≥60 years of age; 287 (65.1%) were illiterate, and 113 (25.6%) were educated at the primary level. Also, 354 (80.3%) were married and the majority (324, 73.5%) had a low-income level. Among uncontrolled BP, most (57.1%) were ≥60 years of age, and those with uncontrolled BP were older by an average 4.2 years. uncontrolled BP differed in terms of BMI and WC abnormalities, smoking status, use of table salt, type of cooking oil used, consumption of dairy products and fruits. Specific details are provided in Table 1.

Table 1. Participants’ demographic characteristic and status of healthy behavior
Variables Blood pressure control status:
441 (100), N(%)
P value
Yes
220 (49.9)
No
221 (50.1)
GenderFemale156 (50.3) 154 (49.7) 0.778a
Male64 (48.9) 67 (51.1)
Age (y)<60121 (57.6) 89 (42.4) 0.002a
≥6099 (42.9) 132 (57.1)
Mean (SD)58.08 (12.7) 62.22 (12.7) 0.001c
Education levelIlliterate130 (45.3) 157 (54.7) 0.124b
Primary66 (58.4) 47 (41.6)
Secondary22 (60.55) 15 (39.45)
University2 (50) 2 (50)
Marital statusSingle41 (47.1) 46 (52.9) 0.565a
Married179 (50.6) 175 (49.4)
Income< 2 a Month160 (49.2) 164 (50.8) 0.435a
2-4 a month55 (53.3) 48 (46.7)
>4 a month5 (38.5) 9 (61.5)
JobEmployee4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) 0.962a
Un employee158 (51.6) 61 (48.4)
Housewife158 (50) 158 (50)
BMINormal72 (64.3) 40 (35.7) <0.001b
Overweight86 (52.1) 79 (47.9)
Grade 1 obesity57 (41.6) 80 (58.4)
Grade 2 obesity5 (18.5) 22 (81.5)
Waist (cm)<9092 (61.3) 58 (38.7) <0.001a
≥90128 (44.3) 163 (55.7)
Daily smokingNo 204 (52.2) 187 (47.8) 0.007a
Yes16 (32) 34 (68)
Use table saltAlways6 (26.1) 17 (73.9) 0.005a
Sometimes66 (44) 84 (56)
Seldom148 (55.2) 120 (44.8)
Type of oil consumedOil only solid semi-solid or animal19 (44.2) 24 (55.8) 0.001a
A combination of liquid and solid130 (45) 159 (55)
Liquid plant only71 (65.1) 38 (34.9)
Consumption of fast food or carbonated beverages2 a week1 (33.3) 2 (66.7) 0.443a
1-2 a month45 (45) 55 (55)
Rarely/Never174 (51.5) 164 (48.5)
Daily milk and dairy Rarely2 (28.6) 5 (71.4) 0.085b
<2 shares76 (44.7) 94 (55.3)
≥2 shares142 (53.8) 122 (46.2)
Vegetable consumption Rarely2 (50) 2 (50) 0.205b
<3 shares83 (44.6) 103 (55.4)
3-5 shares135 (53.8) 116 (2.46)
Fruit consumption Rarely3 (20) 12 (80) 0.005a
2 shares68 (43.9) 87 (56.1)
2-4 shares149 (55) 122 (45)

aPearson chi-square; b Fisher’s exact test; c Independent t test.

Based on Table 2, the overall TIPI scores were not different between controlled and uncontrolled BP, although the mean individual trait score of extraversion was higher among those with controlled BP, while the mean individual trait scores of agreement, conscience, and emotional stability were higher among those with uncontrolled BP. Also, the mean IPAQ score was higher among those with controlled than uncontrolled BP, P<0.001. Also, based on χ2 tests, the control of BP was found to vary with the level of PA status, P<0.001.

Table 2. Distribution of personality traits and physical activity in two groups of patients with controlled and uncontrolled blood pressure
Variable Blood pressure control status P value a
Yes No
Mean (SD) Max-Min Mean (SD) Max-Min
Extraversion(1.85) 8.92-14(1.75) 8.322-140.001
Agreement(1.52) 8.243-12(1.5) 8.632-130.007
Conscience(1.3) 8.025-14(1.47) 8.364-140.010
Emotional stability(1.62) 8.154-12(1.88) 8.514-140.030
being open(1.62) 8.563-14(1.7) 8.733-140.283
Total instrument score(4.94) 41.9028-53(5.07) 42.5728-620.155
Physical activity score3071.01 (39.16)82-39216.601667.59(2880.25)0-18186<0.001
Number (%) Number (%)
Personality characteristicsWeek (10-30)1 (0.50) 1 (0.50) 0.312b
Medium (30-50) 199 (90) 207 (94.1)
Strong (50-70)21 (9.5) 12 (5.5)
Physical activity statusInactive51 (23.2)116 (52.7)<0.001
Low activity97 (44.1)69 (31.2)
Active72 (32.7)35 (15.9)

SD, standard deviation.

a Independent sample t test; bPearson chi-square.

Based on Table 3, the univariate analyses showed that the risk factors for uncontrolled BP were age ≥60 years, smoking, Grade-1 and Grade-2 obesity, WC ≥90 cm levels of table salt use, levels of consuming non-liquid plant-based oils, rare consumption of vegetables, levels of fruit consumption, and low. The only protective factor for control of BP was primary education (OR 0.59 [CI: 0.38, 0.92]) (Table 3). Based on multivariate analyses, the risk factors for uncontrolled BP were age ≥60 years, smoking, levels of income, Grade 1 and 2 obesity (, rare fruit consumption, agreement and conscience personality traits. Also, the only protective factors for control of BP were extraversion personality trait (Table 4).

Table 3. Univariable (unadjusted) logistic regression model for factors association with uncontrolled hypertension
Variable Category Unadjusted
OR (95% CI) P value*
GenderFemaleReference category
Male1.06 (0.70, 1.60) 0.778
Age (y)<60Reference category
≥601.81 (1.24, 2.56) 0.002
Education levelIlliterateReference category
Primary0.59 (0.38, 0.92) 0.019
Secondary0.58 (0.27, 1.27) 0.344
University0.83 (0.50, 1.96) 0.851
Marital statusSingleReference category
Married1.15 (0.17, 2.84)0.566
Daily smokingNoReference category
Yes2.32 (1.42,3.34) 0.009
Income< 2 a MonthReference category
2-4 a month0.85 (0.15, 5.33)0.478
>4 a month1.75 (0.58, 5.35) 0.322
JobLivestockReference category
Farmer2.18 (0.14, 4.36) 0.417
Manual worker2.08 (0.12, 5.45) 0.421
Employee2.57 (0.18, 6.33) 0.346
Freelance1.88 (0.11, 2.78) 0.503
Housewife2.00 (0.11, 5.08) 0.427
BMINormalReference category
Overweight1.65 (1.01, 2.71) 0.045
Grade 1 obesity2.53 (1.40, 4.23) <0.001
Grade 2 obesity7.92 (2.79, 12.52) <0.001
Waist (cm)<90
≥902.02 (1.35, 3.02) <0.001
Use table saltSeldomReference category
Sometimes1.57 (1.05,2.35)0.011
Always3.50 (1.34, 9.14) 0.028
Type of oil consumedLiquid plant only
Oil only solid semi-solid or animal2.91 (1.45, 3.60)0.019
A combination of liquid and solid2.36 (1.15, 4.85) <0.001
Consumption of fast food or carbonated beverages2 a week1.58 (0.85, 2.91) 0.146
1-2 a month1.16 (0.64,2.12)0.614
Rarely / NeverReference category
Daily milk and dairy consumption unit≥2 sharesReference category
<2 shares2.91 (0.55,.27) 0.207
Rarely1.44 (0.98,.12) 0.065
Vegetable consumption unit per week3-5 sharesReference category
<3 shares0.86 (0.67,1.10)0.880
Rarely1.16 (0.16,8.39)0.028
Fruit consumption unit per week2-4 sharesReference category
2 shares1.56 (1.05, 2.32)0.016
Rarely4.88 (1.35,17.70)0.028
Extraversion 1.20 (1.04,1.38)0.001
Agreement 0.84 (0.75, 0.93) 0.008
Conscience 0.85 (0.73, 0.95)0.011
Emotional stability 0.88 (0.71, 0.96) 0.031
Physical activity statusActiveReference category
Low activity4.68 (2.78,.78) <0.001
inactive1.46 (0.88,.43) 0.142

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; OR, Odd ratio; CI, Confidence interval.

Table 4. Multivariable (adjusted) logistic regression model for factors association with uncontrolled hypertension using stepwise approach
Variable Category Adjusted
OR (95% CI) P value
Age<60Reference category
≥60 1.98 (0.70, 1.60) 0.014
Physical activity statusActiveReference category
Low activity1.78 (0.92, 3.41)0.084
Inactive6.11 (3.04,12.27)<0.001
Marital statusSingleReference category
Married1.67 (0.89, 3.13)0.108
Daily smokingNoReference category
Yes3.27 (1.56, 6.89)0.002
Income< 2 a MonthReference category
2-4 a month1.70 (0.92, 3.14)0.088
>4 a month6.32(1.57,11.49)0.009
Type of oil consumedLiquid plant onlyReference category
A combination of liquid and solid2.01 (1.15, 3.53)0.014
Oil only solid semi-solid or anima2.77 (1.12, 6.84)0.028
Use table saltSeldomReference category
Sometimes1.52 (0.91, 2.53)0.112
Always2.95 (0.92, 9.46)0.068
Fruit consumption unit per week≥2 shares
Seldom5.95 (1.24, 12,1)0.009
BMIUnderweight and normalReference category
Grade 1 obesity2.29 (1.28, 4.09)0.005
Grade 2 obesity7.11 (2.21, 12.52)0.001
Waist<90 cmReference category
≥90 cm1.99 (1.14, 3.45)0.015
Agreement 1.26 (1.07,1.48)0.007
Conscience 1.21 (1.02, 1.44)0.028
Extraversion 0.85 (0.73, 0.97)0.020

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; OR, Odd ratio; CI, Confidence interval.


Discussion

HTN as a disease condition is known since centuries; yet there are systematic struggles that continue to manifest. For instance, the lack of adequate awareness, prevention, control, and mitigation may be noted. Till recently, about half of the world’s adult population is likely to have non-optimal BP levels.2 Within this enormous at-risk population pool and from the standpoint of epidemiology and pathophysiology, there are sub-groups with particular characteristics that require special focus, such as older adults. Older adults present unique challenges, such as health, dietary, nutritional, lifestyle, emotive, etc. (e.g., fragility, neuroticism, reduced mobility). These factors may affect their self-efficacy, self-concept, emotional stability, and general ability towards useful health behaviors.22,23 Moreover, HTN has a fairly large “web of causation”; thus, any prevention or control mechanisms must be derived thru’ multi-level causal inferences.

Based on our univariate analyses, the only protective factor for control of BP was primary education. With education comes greater health care awareness that may one help to overcome risks related to HTN, such as low physical activity (PA). Compared to other chronic disease conditions, such as diabetes, HTN and its risk factors are likely to be relatively less known to people with poor education, as these typically develop gradually over many years. Several studies have demonstrated a negative association of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality with education.24 Since, regions would have poorly educated people, we stress the importance of a sound health policy able to reach out to this group, to make them better aware of HTN, as many such people may go un- or in-adequately treated.

Based on our multivariable analyses, we found that the risk for uncontrolled BP was related to demographic, lifestyle and personality factors. The problems in HTN control beyond 60 years of age could symbolize a more general gradual temporal increase in the severity of HTN25 due to, for instance, increased arterial stiffness, obesity, elevated total cholesterol and low high-density lipoprotein levels, etc. But, in our study, the OR of age factor for BP control was not high, probably because our older adults were near about 60 years of age; and the age effects probably manifest further down the age. Others have also shown that, in general, BP control becomes difficult to achieve with increasing.23 Lifestyle modifications are often projected as the only or a cornerstone treatment for controlling HTN in older adults, either with or without active.13 In our study as well, lifestyle factors such as rare fruit consumption and Grade-2 obesity were found to yield fairly high ORs; meaning that lifestyle factors are critical in achieving adequate BP control among older adults. However, one also needs to evaluate here about the possibility of challenges in adequate uptake of recommended lifestyle modifications by older adults. Older adults have limitations, such as an age-related decline in mobility, emotional instability, etc., and their day-to-day lifestyle has been set through habitual cues and practices formed over the years. So, it may not be reasonable to anticipate that older adults may swiftly adopt required lifestyle changes. This difficulty could be one of the reasons behind the intricacy in achieving BP control among older adults.26 So, we believe that interventions on lifestyle modifications must start early in age and be also integrated with mental health or behavioral interventions.

Also, part of the problem in assuring uptake of lifestyle modifications for achieving optimal BP control in one’s later ages can be viewed thru’ personality traits as well. For instance, we found that the traits of extraversion were protective for BP control. So, maneuvering one’s awareness of the “impact that their own behavior would have on themselves and those around them” may help to devise suitable personality-based educational actions. Others have also shown that personality traits are modifiable and are moderators of intervention effects.27 Evidence is consistent with our findings that revealed extraversion as being associated with BP control.10 For instance, individuals who are more extraversion are more likely to do regular physical activity, have regular sleep patterns, have adequate sleep,28 tend to be less sedentary,26 have more peak aerobic capacity,29-31 and tend to engage in behaviors with favorable health and social consequences.32 Muslims are instructed by The Holy Quran to do “dose-based” daily usual religion practice. Religion is likely to provide sustainable population health benefits thru’ many possible ways, such as promoting abstinence, discipline, positive attitude and knowledge towards health maintenance, etc., as it does not require to uptake difficult lifestyle changes.33 Usual religion practice is more pertinent among older adults since older adults are more inclined to seek health and welfare benefits through practice of religion.34,35

Our study has few limitations. For instance, our sample had more females than males However, higher presentation of females in our study may help evade misconceptions that females, especially of the Muslim World, are less likely to seek or access care, at least based on our study. We used case-control design, and calculated odds ratios and effect sizes. Although, odd ratios and effect sizes are standard measures, yet we do not make any cause-effect assertions. Nevertheless, our study provides adequate meat to devise interventions based on factors that we explored in this study.


Conclusions

To conclude, several demographic, lifestyle and personality factors were associated with uncontrolled HTN. We recommend to policy-makers to integrate our findings for specific policy-making actions; e.g., early-age personality-based educational interventions through health centers. We also suggest that clinicians make use of personality traits factor as an additional marker of environmental susceptibility during usual chronic care for screening of high-risk subjects and outcome improvement. The role of other more sustainable mechanisms in the control of HTN such as the usual religion practice must be substantiated. We believe our work provides the required knowledge to design comprehensive HTN prevention programs by taking into account the multi-level causality approach.


Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support and participation of health care centers staff and patients.


Authors’ contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript. AR, NG and AM made contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. AK, ZJ, FSH and DB analyzed and wrote the manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content and edited the manuscript. Finally, all authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work.


Funding

We thank the Research Vice-Chancellor and Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences for the financial support (grant number: 65070).


Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics review committee of Tabriz University (IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.875) with following registering code: 65070. All patients were recruited after written informed consent.


Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


References

  1. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289(19):2560-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560 [Crossref]
  2. Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990-2015. JAMA 2017; 317(2):165-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19043 [Crossref]
  3. Blood pressure-lowering treatment based on cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2014; 384(9943):591-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61212-5 [Crossref]
  4. Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries. Circulation 2016; 134(6):441-50. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.018912 [Crossref]
  5. Prevalence and risk factors associated with nutrition-related noncommunicable diseases in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Int J Gen Med 2012; 5:199-217. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s29663 [Crossref]
  6. Poor compliance to anti-hypertensive drugs among patients in Saudi Arabia. Indo Am J Pharm Sci 2019; 6(2):3752-8. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2563232 [Crossref]
  7. Hypertension in the Middle East. Lancet 2012; 380:1.
  8. Prevalence, awareness and risk factors of hypertension in a large cohort of Iranian adult population. J Hypertens 2013; 31(7):1364-71. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283613053 [Crossref]
  9. Hedayat-Diba Z. Psychotherapy with Muslims. In: Richards PS, Bergin AE, eds. Handbook of Psychotherapy and Religious Diversity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000. p. 289-314.
  10. Personality traits and circadian blood pressure patterns: a 7-year prospective study. Psychosom Med 2014; 76(3):237-43. doi: 10.1097/psy.0000000000000035 [Crossref]
  11. Psychological factors associated with poor hypertension control: differences in personality and stress between patients with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension. Psychol Rep 2010; 107(3):923-38. doi: 10.2466/09.15.20.pr0.107.6.923-938 [Crossref]
  12. Dimensions of neurotic personality and its selected predictors in individuals with arterial hypertension. Psychiatr Pol 2019; 53(4):901-14. doi: 10.12740/PP/100373 [Crossref]
  13. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension 2003; 42(6):1206-52. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2 [Crossref]
  14. Determinants of uncontrolled hypertension in an Iranian population. ARYA Atheroscler 2014; 10(1):25-31.
  15. Universität Düsseldorf: G*Power(hhu.de). Available at: https://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower.
  16. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J Res Pers 2003; 37(6):504-28. doi: 10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1 [Crossref]
  17. The Big Five personality dimensions and mental health: the mediating role of alexithymia. Asian J Psychiatr 2016; 24:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.008 [Crossref]
  18. Modeling the relationship between physical activity and quality of life in menopausal-aged women: a cross-sectional study. J Res Health Sci 2013; 13(2):168-75.
  19. An Interventional strategy of physical activity promotion for reduction of menopause symptoms. Health Promot Perspect 2020; 10(4):383-92. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2020.57 [Crossref]
  20. IPAQ Research Committee. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-Short Form. 2005. Available from: http://www.ipaq.ki.se. Accessed January 18, 2010.
  21. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2019.
  22. Depression is linked to uncontrolled hypertension: a case-control study from Karachi, Pakistan. J Ment Health 2014; 23(6):292-6. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2014.924047 [Crossref]
  23. Hypertension and drug adherence in the elderly. Front Cardiovasc Med 2020; 7:49. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00049 [Crossref]
  24. Risk factors for coronary heart disease and level of education. The Tromsø Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 127(5):923-32. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114895 [Crossref]
  25. Hypertension in adults across the age spectrum: current outcomes and control in the community. JAMA 2005; 294(4):466-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.4.466 [Crossref]
  26. Hypertension in women. Hypertens Res 2012; 35(2):148-52. doi: 10.1038/hr.2011.190 [Crossref]
  27. Personality as a moderator of intervention effects: examining differential susceptibility. Pers Individ Dif 2022; 186(Pt A):111323. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111323 [Crossref]
  28. Personality and sleep: neuroticism and conscientiousness predict behaviourally recorded sleep years later. Eur J Pers 2019; 33(2):133-53. doi: 10.1002/per.2191 [Crossref]
  29. Physical activity and sedentary behavior during COVID-19: trajectory and moderation by personality. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 2021; 12(6):1103-9. doi: 10.1177/1948550620962945 [Crossref]
  30. Effect of eight weeks aerobic training and supplementation of green tea on apelin plasma levels and insulin resistance in elderly women with type 2 diabetes. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2019; 28(170):84-93.
  31. Combined effect of eight weeks high intensity resistance training with ginger supplementation on waist to hip ratio, body composition and body mass in obese women. Koomesh 2017; 19(2):289-93.
  32. The future of health behaviour change interventions: opportunities for open science and personality research. Health Psychol Rev 2020; 14(1):176-81. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1707107 [Crossref]
  33. Koenig HG, McCullough ME, Larson DB. Disease prevention, disease detection, and treatment compliance. In: Koening HG, ed. Handbook of Religion and Health. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 397-410.
  34. Personal spirituality as a moderator of the relationship between stressors and subjective well-being. J Psychol Theol 2000; 28(3):221-8. doi: 10.1177/009164710002800305 [Crossref]
  35. Psychological pathways between type D personality and COVID-19. Health Psychol Rep 2022; 10(1):20-30. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2021.110933 [Crossref]
Submitted: 14 Feb 2022
Revised: 13 Jun 2022
Accepted: 24 Jun 2022
First published online: 20 Aug 2022
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

Abstract View: 746
PDF Download: 452
Full Text View: 137