2022: Two-year Impact Factor: 4.4
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2022): 5.3
SJR(2022): 0.78
Open Access

Determinants of breast cancer screening uptake in Kurdishwomen of Iran

Health Promotion Perspectives

eISSN: 2228-6497

Health Promotion Perspectives, 6(1), 42-46; DOI:10.15171/hpp.2016.07

Original Article

Determinants of breast cancer screening uptake in Kurdishwomen of Iran

Nayyereh Aminisani1,*, Roujin Fattahpour1, Saeed Dastgiri2, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi3, Hamid Allahverdipour4

1 Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Tabriz Health Services Management Research Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Clinical Psychiatry Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

*Corresponding Author: Nayyereh Aminisani; Tel: +98 41 33357580; Fax: +98 41 33340634; Email: aminisani_n@hotmail.com

© 2016 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Background: Recently, a national breast cancer screening program has been introduced in Iran.The aim of this study was to examine the determinants of breast cancer screening uptake among Kurdish women, in order to identify those characteristics that may be potentially associated with the screening uptake.

Methods: Through a cross sectional study, in 2014, a random sample of 561 women aged 40 years and older without the history of breast cancer and identified with Kurdish background in Baneh county, Iran, were recruited and interviewed by two trained interviewers. Data were collected using a valid and reliable researcher made questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models with self-reported screening history as the dependent variable were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% of CI.

Results: The mean age of women was 43.64 (SD = 5.17). The participation rate in the mammography program was 16.8% (95% CI: 13.7-19.8%). The lowest level of participation was found among women aged 60 and older (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.14-0.69), illiterate (OR = 0.63,95% CI: 0.40-0.99) and post-menopausal (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35-0.91) women.

Conclusion: It was found that the level of breast screening uptake was low among Kurdish women compared to those reported in the previous studies. Designing participation enhancing interventions with a specific focus on older, illiterate and post-menopausal women are recommended.

Keywords: Breast cancer screening, Socioeconomic status, Determinants, Minority, Iran

Citation: Aminisani N, Fattahpour R, Dastgiri S, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Allahverdipour H. Determinants of breast cancer screening uptake in Kurdish women of Iran. Health Promot Perspect. 2016;6(1):42-46. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2016.07.


Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in both developed and less developed countries. In 2012, there had been reported about 1.67 million new cases of this cancer which comprised approximately 25.5% of all cancer cases.1 Globally, there is a regional variability in the incidence rates of this disease ranging from 27 per 100 000 in African and Middle Eastern countries to 96 per 100 000 in Western Europe and it is, also, the most frequent cause of cancer mortality among women in the less developed regions and the second in the developed countries.1

Breast cancer mortality has fallen considerably after the introduction of breast cancer screening in the western countries.2 However, the screening is unavailable or less utilized (if available) in the developing countries where the majority of breast cancer deaths are occurred.1 Results from previous studies have shown that the pattern of breast cancer screening uptake is different among women throughout the world; women from socioeconomic disadvantaged groups, belong to ethnic or minority groups, disabled and frontiers have been reported to be in the least level of breast cancer screening participation rates.3-7

In Iran, breast cancer is the most frequent cancer among women with incidence rate of 25 per 100 000.8 The National Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) was introduced in 2012 and is currently implemented in some cities with less than 50 000 inhabitants, to initial evaluation of the program, and will be expanded to all the cities in the future.9 According to its National Guideline, the following schedule for breast cancer screening is recommended: (1) Mammography: women older than 40 should have an annual mammogram, (2) Clinical breast examination (CBE): women with 20 to 40 years of age should have one CBE per 3 years and, also, after 40 an annual CBE by a health professional is emphasized, and (3) Breast self-examination (BSE): women older than 20 should perform monthly BSE.9

Despite the potential benefits of mammography screening for breast cancer in women aged 40 and older, the findings of previous studies have revealed the low level of performance and ethnic variations in breast cancer screening among Iranian women (less than 1% to 44%).10-15

Therefore, in the process of developing a nationwide screening program, it is important to identify the associated factors of breast cancer screening uptake in Iran, especially among women from minority groups living in frontiers. The findings may help the health policy makers in improving the NBCSP and achieving the goal of equity in health care services. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the level of breast cancer screening uptake among women aged 40 and older hoping to identify the mainly socio-demographic and health related determinants of participation in breast cancer screening in Baneh county, Iran.

Materials and Methods

Participants and Procedures

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Baneh county – a deprived area located in the west border of Iran with a total population of about 150 000 people. In 2014, stratified random sampling was employed to recruit 570 women aged 40 and older from six health centers to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria were aged 40 and older, being Iranian Kurd and with no history of breast cancer. They received a telephone invitation to attend a face to face interview in the health center, and if they were not able to come to the health center, they were suggested to be interviewed at home. In total, 561 women were accepted to participate in the study (participation rate = 98%).


Data were collected using a researcher made structured questionnaire including three sections; (1) Demographic characteristics and socioeconomic status (SES), (2) Clinical and lifestyle characteristics including reproductive factors (parity, contraceptive [OCP] use, menopause status), family history of breast cancer, comorbidities, and overall health, and (3) Breast cancer screening (clinical examination and mammography).

Age was classified into three categories: 40-49, 50-59, and 60+ years. Marital status was categorized as married (living with a spouse), and not married (divorced or widowed). SES was assessed using different variables including educational status, occupational status and insurance coverage. Educational status was categorized as illiterate and literate. Occupational status was, also, classified as in-paid work/retired and housewife. Family welfare was assessed by a question “How do you rate your family welfare?” with five Likert-type scale from “excellent to poor.” Comorbidities were based on the self-report history of frequent diseases like hypertension, diabetes, osteoporosis, heart diseases, and so on. Body mass index (BMI) was classified into three categories: healthy weight (BMI <25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2<30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2).

The main outcome measures were having had the history of mammography by means of a mammogram and having had a history of mammography and/or clinical examination. The respondents were asked two questions regarding screening uptake: “Have you ever had a breast physical examination in which a medical doctor or health professional checked your breasts for lumps?” and “Have you ever had a mammography?” Having a mammogram and/or CBE (yes = 1, no = 0) were the dependent variables.

Statistical analysis

Univariate analyses were used to describe the general characteristics of the study population. Multivariate logistic regression models with self-reported screening history (clinical examination/mammography) as the dependent variable were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% of CI. Two models were built: adjusted for age, marital status, and education; and fully adjusted for age, marital status and education as well as health related factors (BMI, comorbidities, family history of breast cancer, and menopause status). Analysis was performed using SPSS version 23. Level of significance was considered to be 0.05, at the priori.


A total of 561 women aged 40 and older were included in this study. Mean age of the women was 43.64 ± 5.17 and the majority (55%) was in the range of 40-49. The majority (81%) were married and currently live with their spouse, about 60% were illiterate and only 7% were involved in in-paid work. About 40% had no health insurance and 81% were overweight/obese. Also, 55.7% had at least a disease comorbidity which was mostly hypertension and diabetes. Less than 30% reported to be OCP users. About 12% had a family history of breast cancer and about 45% were in the postmenopausal status (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics among women 40 years and older in Baneh, west of Iran, 2014
Variables Number Percent
Age group
40-49 305 54.5
50-59 149 26.6
60+ 105 18.9
Marital status
Married 453 80.9
Single/divorce/widow 107 19.1
Illiterate 329 58.6
Literate 232 41.4
Self-report family welfare
Low 97 17.7
Middle 372 67.8
Upper middle and higher 79 14.5
Job status
In-paid work/retired 39 07.0
Housewife 520 93.0
Yes 325 59.3
No 223 40.7
Yes 310 55.7
No 246 44.3
Less than 25 101 18.9
25-25.9 229 42.5
30+ 208 38.6
OCP use
Yes 155 28.1
No 395 71.9
Yes 252 45.3
No 305 54.7
Family history
Yes 66 11.8
No 490 88.2

Mammography uptake was reported by 16.8% (n = 90) of the women. Also, performing mammography and/or clinical breast screening were 22% (95% CI: 18.5-25.3%). Mammography uptake was less common among older women; crude ORs for having mammography were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.52-1.44) for women aged 50-59 and 0.30 (95% CI: 0.14-0.69) for women aged 60 and older in proportion to the younger women (40-49 years of age) (Table 2). Adjustment for age, marital status and educational status attenuated the OR for women aged 50-59 but had little effect for women aged 60 and older (OR = O.35, 95% CI: 0.15-0.84). Addition of some health-related factors (BMI, comorbidities, having the history of breast cancer, menopause status) into the model had more effect on the ORs especially among women aged 50-59; the effect increased as the uptake of mammography was 14% higher compared to the women aged 40-49, but it is still about 50% lower among women aged 60 and older in comparison with the younger women (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.17-1.48). Crude OR for women who live with their spouse was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.46-1.38) in proportion to the single/divorced/widowed women. Adjustment in both models had very little effect on ORs.

Table 2. Mammography uptake by demographic & socioeconomic factors, and health related factors among women 40 years and older in Baneh, west of Iran, 2014
Variable Total Uptake N (%) ORa (CI 95%) ORb (CI 95%) ORc (CI 95%)
Age group
40-4930558 (19.01)ReferentReferentReferent
50-5914925 (16.77)0.86 (0.52-1.44)0.93 (0.54-1.63)1.14 (0.56-2.34)
60+1057 (6.60)0.30 (0.14-0.69)0.35 (0.15-0.84)0.50 (0.17-1.48)
P value0.020.060.22
Marital status
Married45370 (15.45)0.80 (0.46-1.38)0.81 (0.47-1.41)0.77 (0.44-1.38)
Single/divorce/widow10720 (18.69)ReferentReferentReferent
P value0.410.460.38
Illiterate32844 (13.41)0.63 (0.40-0.99)0.81 (0.49-1.34)0.82 (0.48-1.40)
literate23246 (19.82)ReferentReferentReferent
P value0.040.410.46
Yes 310 44 (14.19) 0.72 (0.46-1.13) 0.86 (0.54-1.38) 0. 89 (0.54-1.46)
No 246 46 (18.69) Referent Referent Referent
P value0.150.530.64
Less than 2510117 (16.83)ReferentReferentReferent
25-29.922937 (16.15)0.95 (0.51-1.79)0.84 (0.44-1.59)0.87 (0.45-1.66)
30+20834 (16.34)0.97 (0.51-1.83)0.84 (0.44-1.61)0. 84 (0.44-1.63)
P value0.990.840.87
Yes25230 (11.9)0.56 (0.35-0.91)0.72 (0.36-1.45)0.76 (0.37-1.59)
No30559 (19.34)ReferentReferentReferent
P value 0.02 0.31 0.47
Family history
Yes 66 13 (19.69) 1.34 (0.70-2.57) 1.32 (0.68-2.56) 1.35 (0.69-2.63)
No 490 76 (15.51) Referent Referent Referent
P value 0.39 0.41 0.39

Numbers obtained by adding together categories for each variable may not always add to total sample size due to missing data

aCrude odds ratio; bOdds ratio adjusted for age, marital status, and education; cOdds ratio adjusted for age, marital status, education, BMI, comorbidities, and history of breast cancer, menopause status

The odds of breast cancer screening uptake were less common among illiterate compared to the literate women (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40-0.99). Adjustment for age and marital status and health-related factors had little effect on the ORs of being screened among illiterate women. Among women with comorbidities, ORs were lower compared to the women with no comorbid disease (crude OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.46-1.13), and there was found an increase in ORs (fully adjusted OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.54-1.46), after adjustment. Mammography uptake was similar according to BMI categories, however, after adjustment, there was a decrease in ORs (both adjusted models) among women with BMI ≥30 (Fully adjusted OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.44-1.63). In proportion to the women in pre-menopause category, post-menopausal women were less likely to have performed mammography (crude OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35-0.91) but the effect was attenuated a little (fully adjusted OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.37-1.59), after adjustment, and was no longer statistically significant. Women with a family history of breast cancer were 34% more likely to report mammography compared to the women without family history, and, fully adjustment did not change the effect.


This study aimed to examine breast cancer screening uptake and its determinants in a minority group in Iran; Kurdish women living in Baneh county – a deprived area in the west of country. Iran is in the stage of implementing NBCSP which must cover women from diverse ethnic backgrounds, different SES and wide geographical areas. Therefore it is important to identify potential determinants of screening uptake.

The overall uptake of mammography in this study was about 17% which is lower than those reported in developed countries; UK: 77%, USA: 67%, Finland: 87%, and, Italy: 60%16-18 but it is somewhat more common among those reported Turkmen women (less than 1%)10 followed by women from south east of Iran11 which was 1.5%. The highest uptake of mammography reported from Isfahan (44.3%).12 Lack of access to mammography facilities in this county might be an explanation for the low screening uptake, since the nearest mammography center requires one hour driving.

It was found that women in the younger (40-49) and older (60+) ages had the higher and the lower percentages of mammography uptake, respectively. Moreover, women with the postmenopausal status were less likely to report the mammography screening uptake. It is similar to the findings of previous studies in other countries19 and in Iran,12 as well. Whilst older women are more likely to develop breast cancer and should be targeted for health promotion program.

In the present study, mammography uptake was higher among literate women. Those with no health insurance had a lower percentage of uptakes. Many previous studies have found that women in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups had a lower participation rate in breast cancer screening,3,6,7,20 for example, results of an Italian study21 showed that women with higher levels of education were more likely to have a mammogram than those with a lower level (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.10-1.49) and women of intermediate and high occupational classes were more likely to use breast cancer screening (OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.55-2.03; OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.40-1.91) compared to unemployed women.

The results showed that women with comorbidities had lower screening uptake compared to those without comorbidities which was attenuated after fully adjustment. However, a previous study22 reported that comorbid condition is associated with a regular mammography and earlier stage of diagnosis. This is because women who receive comorbidity-related care are more likely to receive regular mammography as a result of regular primary care visits. In contrast, another study23 reported the lower timely mammography among women of different racial/ethnical groups who had comorbidity because they might receive underserved medical care.

In the present study, it was found that undergoing mammography was more common among women with normal weight compared to the overweight/obese women, but after adjustment, overweight/ obese women had a lower uptake compared to women with normal weight. The similar results were reported in Korean24 and German studies.25 However, in another study by Tekkel et al,26 in Estonia, opposite findings were reported. This might be explained in a way that obese women are less likely to adhere screening recommendation, or use the health services in the host countries.

In this study, mammography use was high among women with a family history of breast cancer. The same results were reported by another study.27 This might be explained by the fact that such women have higher perceived susceptibility and or severity on breast cancer. Another possibility is that the physicians might be more sensitive about these women and prescribe them for mammography.

There were some strengths and limitations for the present study. It was the first study to examine the mammography screening uptake among Kurdish women aged 40 years and older living in frontiers where the facilities for doing screening is poor. However, the overall low uptake (16%) might be influenced by some other determinants that were not studied in the present research.


The results of this study indicated that the mammography uptake among Kurdish women in Baneh, is low, and highlighted the need for implementing a comprehensive educational intervention, which should be considered as a top priority for health policy makers and providers. Also, the lack of mammography facilities nearby might be an important barrier and needs to be considered in the process of developing the NBCSP as the main infrastructure. In the present study, some influential factors were identified which may help to design and deliver an appropriate educational intervention to the target population. Further research is recommended to find out the potential barriers of screening participation in such areas.

Ethical approval

This study received ethical approval from Ethics Committee in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. All participants completed a consent form before the interviews.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


This study was funded by the research council, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences for which we are thankful. We also extend our gratitude to the head of Baneh Health Centre, and those who contributed to data collection and all women who participated in this study.


  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International agency for research on cancer; Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr.
  2. Hery C, Ferlay J, Boniol M, Autier P. Quantification of changes in breast cancer incidence and mortality since 1990 in 35 countries with Caucasian-majority populations. Annals Oncol 2008;19(6):1187-94. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn025. [Crossref]
  3. Akinyemiju TF. Socio-economic and health access determinants of breast and cervical cancer screening in low-income countries: analysis of the World Health Survey. PloS One 2012;7(11):e48834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048834. [Crossref]
  4. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 2003;97(6):1528-40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11208. [Crossref]
  5. Goel MS, Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Ngo-Metzger Q, Phillips RS. Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening: the importance of foreign birth as a barrier to care. J General Intern Med 2003;18(12):1028-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.20807. [Crossref]
  6. Selvin E, Brett KM. Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women. Am J Pub Health 2003;93(4):618-23.
  7. O’Malley AS, Forrest CB, Mandelblatt J. Adherence of low-income women to cancer screening recommendations. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17(2):144-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10431. [Crossref]
  8. Cancer registration country reports 2009. Iran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Cancer office; 2012.
  9. National Breast Cancer Screening Program, Iran. Health Ministry of Iran, Noncommunicable Diseases Management Center, Cancer Office; 2011.
  10. Charkazi A, Samimi A, Razzaghi K, Kouchaki GM, Moodi M, Meirkarimi K, et al. Adherence to recommended breast cancer screening in Iranian turkmen women: the role of knowledge and beliefs. ISRN Prev Med 2013;2013:581027.doi: 10.5402/2013/581027. [Crossref]
  11. Heidari Z, Mahmoudzadeh-Sagheb H, Sakhavar N. Breast cancer screening knowledge and practice among women in southeast of Iran. Acta Med Iran 2008;46(4):321-8.
  12. Moodi M, Rezaeian M, Mostafavi F, Sharifirad GR. Determinants of mammography screening behavior in Iranian women: a population-based study. J Res Med Sci 2012;17(8):750-9.
  13. Noroozi A, Tahmasebi R. Factors influencing breast cancer screening behavior among Iranian women. Asia Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12(5):1239-44.
  14. Salimi Pormehr S, Kariman N, Sheykhan Z, Alavi Majd H. Investigation of breast cancer screening tests performance and affecting factors in women referred to Ardebil’s health and medical centers, 2009. Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences 2010;10(4):310-8.
  15. Allahverdipour H, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Emami A. Breast cancer risk perception, benefits of and barriers to mammography adherence among a group of Iranian women. Women Health 2011;51(3):204-19. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2011.564273. [Crossref]
  16. Health and Social Care Information Centre, Screening and Immunizations team Breast Screening Programme, England - 2011-12. [cited 15 November 2015]; Available at: http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB10339.
  17. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2013-2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc; 2013.
  18. Dowling EC, Klabunde C, Patnick J, Ballard-Barbash R. Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries. J Med Screen 2010;17(3):139-46. doi: 10.1258/jms.2010.010033. [Crossref]
  19. Edwards NI, Jones DA. Uptake of breast cancer screening in older women. Age Ageing 2000;29(2):131-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/29.2.131. [Crossref]
  20. Schueler KM, Chu PW, Smith-Bindman R. Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008;17(9):1477-98. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0603. [Crossref]
  21. Damiani G, Federico B, Basso D, Ronconi A, Bianchi CB, Anzellotti GM, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 2012;12:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-99. [Crossref]
  22. Yasmeen S, Xing G, Morris C, Chlebowski RT, Romano PS. Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer 2011;117(14):3252-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25857. [Crossref]
  23. Talley CH, Williams KP. Impact of age and comorbidity on cervical and breast cancer literacy of African Americans, Latina, and Arab women. Nursing Clin North Am 2015;50(3):545-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2015.05.008. [Crossref]
  24. Kim BH, Koh SB, Hur HK, Park JK, Park SM. Women’s cancer screening according to Body Mass Index in a cohort of rural Korean women. J Korean Acad Nurs 2009;39(5):641-50. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2009.39.5.641. [Crossref]
  25. Meisinger C, Heier M, Loewel H. The relationship between body weight and health care among German women. Obes Res 2004;12(9):1473-80. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.184. [Crossref]
  26. Tekkel M, Veideman T, Rahu M. Use of mammography, Pap test and prostate examination by body mass index during the developmental period of cancer screening in Estonia. Public Health 2011;125(10):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.06.013. [Crossref]
  27. Murabito JM, Evans JC, Larson MG, Kreger BE, Splansky GL, Freund KM, et al. Family breast cancer history and mammography: Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154(10):916-23.
Submitted: 09 Dec 2015
Accepted: 25 Feb 2016
First published online: 31 Mar 2016
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

Abstract View: 2569
PDF Download: 1285
Full Text View: 1314