Logo-hpp
2023: Two-year Impact Factor: 2.4
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2023):7.1
 
Platinum
Open Access

Physical activity interventions in African American women: A systematic review

Health Promotion Perspectives

eISSN: 2228-6497

Health Promotion Perspectives, 7(2), 52-59; DOI:10.15171/hpp.2017.11

Systematic Review

Physical activity interventions in African American women: A systematic review

Vanessa Bland 1,*, Manoj Sharma1


1 Behavioral & Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Jackson State University, MS, USA

*Corresponding Author: Vanessa Bland; Jackson State University, 51 Northtown Drive Apt 8D, Jackson, MS 39211. Tel: 1-662-739-9892; Email: nessap1@yahoo.com


© 2017 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: African American women are at high risk of acquiring chronic diseases due to sedentary lifestyles. This objective of this article was to perform a narrative systematic review of physical activity interventions among African American women published between 2009 and 2015.

Methods: A review of literature in following databases: Academic Search Premier, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health), ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), MEDLINE, PsychInfo, and SPORTDiscus was performed to locate interventions promoting physical activity among African American women.

Results: The search yielded 13 interventions. All the studies were conducted within the United States. It was found that walking coupled with healthy food choices were salient strategies in the interventions. Studies using social support along with healthy diet were found to be more efficacious in fostering physical activity among African American women.

Conclusion: Walking, social support and a healthy diet were found to be significant strategies promoting physical activity in African American women. Physical activity for African American women must build on the constructs of healthier food choices and social support.


Keywords: Exercise, Physical activity, Blacks, African Americans, Women

Citation: Bland V, Sharma M. Physical activity interventions in African American women: A systematic review. Health Promot Perspect.2017;7(2):52-59. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2017.11.

Introduction

Physical activity comprises of any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that use energy. Physical inactivity has been recognized as the fourth leading risk factor for mortality around the world causing an estimated 3.2 million deaths.1 The US President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports formed in 1956 underscored the importance of physical activity for a long time. Since 1990, in United States every 10 years Healthy People Objectives have been published that have included objectives for increasing physical activity.2 The World Health Organization (WHO)3 also recommends that adults between the ages of 18–64 years must participate in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity during the week or at least 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity during the week.

Despite the recommendations there are several subsections of the society that do not engage in sufficient and regular physical activity. African American women are a particular susceptible group for unhealthy lifestyles, particularly physical inactivity, and the ensuing chronic diseases and outcomes.4 Obesity has increased in African American women in United States with obesity being around 50%.5 Obesity poses a risk for several adverse health outcomes such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, and other diseases.5

The prevalence of obesity is significantly greater among African American women as compared to the Caucasian American counterparts.6 Further, African American women are more likely to underestimate their body weight which is associated with reduced weight management behaviors, higher weight gain and an under assessment of health risks. This under estimation of weight can be an important barrier to effective weight management in African American women.6 Perception of body image can be an indicator of health risks and weight status and is associated with race. As mentioned earlier, Black women often misjudge their body size and do not report body image dissatisfaction in comparison to Whites.7 Furthermore, as mentioned earlier Black women have higher rates of sedentary behavior compared to other racial/ethnic subgroups. Consequently, African American women have higher morbidity and mortality associated with inadequate levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior. Hence, effective strategies to enhance and sustain physical activity among this at-risk population are critical.8 Physical activity promotes a healthier lifestyle and reduces the risk of chronic diseases and premature death.

Previous research has found that there are cultural differences regarding physical activity between African American and other races. There is a commonality of lack of time, deficient energy, and time devoted to caregiving by all women for not being physical active. However, African American women have their unique reasons for not being active such as lack of a safe place to be physically active, being self-conscious and not being overtly conscious of their weight and body size.9

Black community in general is more religious than other groups with 79% mentioning church being very important in their lives.10 Interventions that utilize church as a setting have a greater potential for reaching out African Americans and facilitating regular physical activity in this community.10 Sharma et al11 conducted a cross-sectional study to examine the degree to which self-efficacy for physical activity and social support were related to the length of time for leisure-time physical activity in a group of African American women. The study found that self-efficacy for moderate-intensity leisure-time physical activity and frequency of friends’ social support were significant predictors constructs.

There have been interventions that have been designed for African American women. However, in recent years no systematic review has been done on interventions pertaining to African American women. Such a review can identify what works and what does not work and provide guidance to future interventions.

It is in this context that the objective of this paper is to provide a narrative and systematic review of physical activity programs among African American women published between 2009 and 2015. For the sake of this paper, the terms African American and Black has been used interchangeably. The primary focus of this paper is to discuss whether the interventions increased physical activity among African American women. Duration, frequency, intensity levels, tracking of the interventions and how the interventions are prescribed were the key aspects that were reviewed.

Materials and Methods

A review of literature was performed to locate interventions for physical activity published between 2009 and 2015 among African American women in following databases: Academic Search Premier, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health), ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) MEDLINE, PsychInfo, and SPORTDiscus. The first search used the keywords “physical activity interventions” and “African American women”; the second search used the keywords “physical activity interventions” and “Black women” and; the third search used the key words “physical activity interventions,” “African American/Black women” and “randomized control trials”; the final search used the keywords “physical activity interventions,” or “physical activity programs” and “African American/Black women.”

The inclusion criteria were articles (1) that included African American women (18 years and older), (2) publications in English language, (3) publications between January 2009 and January 2015, (4) full-text/scholarly peer-reviewed journals (5) that included evaluation of interventions as opposed to mere description and (6) that included both qualitative and quantitative and impact evaluations. Articles were excluded from this review based on the following: (1) if the articles were identified as review articles, (2) articles written in languages other than English, (3) articles than included ethnicities other than African Americans and (4) dissertations. This is further illustrated in Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used in retrieving the articles,12 There were two researchers who conducted the search. One was a doctoral student of public health and another one was a professor of public health aided by a librarian. The data were searched from the databases and the title and abstracts were read to see if they met the inclusion criteria. When in doubt the full text article was obtained. The search was confined to the published literature in the six databases and articles from the grey literature were not included in the search. The data used was from published articles only and the authors were not contacted for any clarifications. The data were extracted in the form of a Table that is presented in this review.

Figure 1. Intervention article selection process based on PRISMA guidelines.

Results

The data extraction method yielded a total of 14 studies evaluating 13 distinct interventions from 2009 to 2015 that met the inclusion criteria, which is presented in Table 1. Table 1 presents a summary of the studies’ important attributes that included physical activity interventions in African American women. The 13 interventions included focused on African American women studies conducted in the states of Alabama, Mississippi, Arizona, California, Illinois, North Carolina and South Carolina. Sample sizes of these studies ranged from 15 to 565 participants and the means of reported means of the sample size were 155.64 with a standard deviation of 173.53. The studies included participants ranging from 18 to 70 years of age among those studies that mentioned the participants age. The reported means of age were 48.28 years with a standard deviation of 10.85 years. Of the 13 interventions, with the combination of the two articles that used the same intervention,13,14 four of the studies’ were conducted at community health centers,15-18 three of the studies used several churches as their study setting,19-21 two were conducted in southern rural communities,13,14 two used a medical center as the setting of choice,22,23 one used two beauty salons,24 one used a college university location25 and one used several counties in the Alabama area as the study setting.26

Table 1.‏ Summary of physical activity interventions in African American women

Majority of the studies (n = 6)16,17,19,21,22,25 were randomized controlled designs. Three of the studies used quasi-experimental designs16,18,24 and one used a qualitative exploratory design.15 The remaining studies were pilot and feasibility studies. Additionally, one of the studies used both a quasi-experimental and randomized controlled design.16 Many studies used behavioral theories in their theoretical framework to explain, predict or show relationship between the studies’ research hypothesis and problems.

The duration of the physical activity interventions varied from 5 weeks to 24 months with a mean of 34.07 weeks and a standard deviation of 31.48 weeks. The studies’ physical interventions included walking and running exercises, indoor/home activities (cooking, cleaning, dusting, gardening), line dancing, praise dancing, yoga, Zumba, kickboxing and aerobics. The studies’ either included a physical activity intervention(s) and/or utilized physical activity questionnaires to ask participants what physical exercises they were incorporating into their daily routine. The frequency of the physical activity interventions ranged from 15-30 minutes per day, 1-9 hours per week or 3-5 times a week. The physical activity interventions were tracked by pedometers, accelerometers, heart rate monitors, automated telephone system, walking log books and diaries. Majority of the interventions prescribed were moderate to vigorous intensity exercises. The interventions were prescribed by means of group counseling sessions, telephone coaching/counseling, workshops, focus groups and educational sessions/meetings.

Physiological data were measured by 7 interventions included blood pressure,13,1417.19,20,22 capillary blood flow,17 heart rate,16,20 fasting lipid panel that included total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C)1,3,14,20,22 triglycerides,14 glucose levels14 and waist circumference.13,14,17 Common primary outcomes measured were diet,17,24,25 fried food consumption,25 water consumption,25 barriers to physical activity,15,22,23 physical activity adherence,13,15,16,18,23 neighborhood characteristics16,18 and spirituality.21 Psychological well-being18,21 and social support13-15,20,22,24 was also evaluated in some of the studies. Physical activity was assessed by the following scales, questionnaires and surveys: Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS),17,19 Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance Survey,26 Physical Activity and Disability Survey (PADS).22,23 Barriers to Physical Activity and Disability Survey (B-PADS)22,23 were used to asses environmental and facility barriers and the social support for physical activity were measured by the Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ)20 which measured the specific domains of social support including appraisal, belonging, tangible and self-esteem. The New Leaf Dietary Risk Assessment (DRA)17 were used to evaluate diet, the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale18 were used to assess depressive symptoms and the Quality of Well-Being (QWB) scale22 assessed expression of well-being. In addition, global questions (“How many minutes of physical activity [walking, running, or other exercise] do you get daily?” were also used to measure physical activity that were developed form a pre-and posttest questionnaire.24

Instruments commonly utilized in the studies to measure physical activity were pedometers,13,14,19,21,22,25 accelerometers20,21 and heart rate monitors.15,16,18,25 Focused groups, interviewing, and telephone-based counseling were techniques used to connect, support and motivate the women’s progress to encourage healthy behaviors. Also, these techniques were used as a strategy to collect data in relation to prior level of physical activity behavior, expected outcomes and perceived outcomes of the participants experience regarding compliance and adherence to physical activity.

Discussion

Physical inactivity is a public health concern. The development of physical activity interventions is important for those at risk of developing other health conditions. The purposes of this review were to look at studies published between 2009 and 2015 to provide a narrative and systematic review of interventions for physical activity conducted among African American women. A total of 13 interventions met the inclusion criteria.

From the 13 interventions, seven of the physical activity programs demonstrated that the interventions increased physical activity among African American women13,14,17,19,20,22,23 and two of the studies showed that there was an increase intake of fruits and vegetables.24,26 Although, the interventions demonstrated positive changes in physical activity, a few of the studies17,23 still presented barriers to physical activity. Two studies demonstrated that physical activity was not sustained throughout the 24-month period,26 nor at post-test the findings were significant for water consumption and physical activity.24 The physical activity interventions demonstrated that limiting barriers to adhere to physical activity and safe neighborhoods are significant in the increase of physical activity among African American women.

Of the 13 interventions, only seven used randomized controlled trials.16,17,18,19,22,26 Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard for clinical purposes. More studies must utilize randomized controlled designs so that more evidence-based literature can be generated.

Social cognitive theory and the trans-theoretical model were commonly used approaches utilized in the studies. Social cognitive theory premises that there is an interaction of personal factors and environment on behaviors including sustenance of physical activity.21 Theories are useful in measuring behavioral concepts and/or reasons for certain behavioral patterns. Sample size was found to be a limitation in some of the studies. The studies should focus on an adequate number of participants to generalize the results to a large number of individuals otherwise a small sample size lacks power of the statistical results. Another noted limitation was that a few of the physical activity interventions showed no significance after follow-up. This suggests that further research is needed to develop interventions that will increase physical activity among African American women.

Physical activity interventions should target habits and personal behaviors that limit physical activity. Physical activity interventions primary concern should not be directed toward weight loss because there are other areas that affect physical activity that many researchers do not address. Researchers should incorporate behavioral components in physical activity interventions to understand the perceptions of the lack of physical activity among African American women.

The review had several limitations. First, the identified physical activity interventions had the time frame of only 2009 to 2015. Although, more current information is typical in research, excluding studies outside of the time period may cause the researcher(s) to disregard significant information from previous studies that may be favorable to a present and/or future study.

Secondly, the study was restricted to specific databases. Only six databases were used to obtain information on this topic. This omits other databases that may provide important information pertaining to the topic. And third, the physical activity interventions chosen were of English language. Foreign interventions were excluded granting such interventions also provide important information regarding physical activity in children and adults targeting an increase in physical activity. Despite the limitations of the study, the findings do support previous research demonstrating that educational physical activity interventions do have a positive influence to enhance physical activity for African American women.

Implications for future studies

Physical activity interventions should not primarily target weight loss but healthy dietary habits, changes in behavior and the environment. Lack of social support and countless responsibilities are reasons for the lack of physical activity among this group of women.19 One way to address this issue is by providing neighborhood facilities that provides support for women that desire to have a more active lifestyle. Incorporating nutritional classes during fitness hours may also be helpful to address unhealthy dietary habits.

To address changes in behavior, physical activity interventions may consider incorporating behavioral theories. The intervention itself will not change the individuals’ behavior; rather the implemented activities that target certain behavioral patterns that influences behaviors. Therefore, such interventions should be measured and tested to establish valid and reliable results. This will provide evidence that theory-based interventions will exemplify power among certain target groups.

Finally, researchers and public health professionals should consider the built environment when developing physical activity interventions. Researchers should consider the geographical features of given neighborhoods to determine ways to modify the environment to increase physical activity in all areas. This may propose developments of physical activity policies and/or recommendations for future research interventions.

Conclusion

Physical inactivity is a major public health issue. Due to the lack of physical activity, there has been an increase in obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. More groups are affected by these diseases and the lack of physical activity, particularly African American women. One way to address this issue is to develop interventions that increase physical activity among African American women. Of the total 13 interventions, there was an increase in physical activity in 7 of the physical activity interventions. This shows that African American women can adhere to physical activity interventions. In all, the studies’ were associated with one another because the aim of the studies’ were to provide information regarding interventions for African American women and/or provide useful information that researchers my utilized to develop other interventions to promote physical activity among African American women. Despite the limitations of the studies, the interventions implemented did show an increase in physical activity.

Ethical approval

Ethical considerations are not applicable for this paper.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Authors’ contributions

VB conceptualized the study, collected the articles, summarized the articles and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. MS helped in conceptualizing the study, collected the articles, and helped in finalization of the manuscript.

Disclaimer

The authors claim that no part of this manuscript has been copied from other sources.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Jackson State University for its support.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Physical activity. 2015. http://www.who.int/topics/physical_activity/en/. Accessed August 20, 2016.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Historical context: selected milestones in physical activity research, promotion and surveillance. 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/physical_activity/pa_history.htm. Accessed August 20, 2016.
  3. World Health Organization. Physical activity and adults. 2015. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_adults/en/. Accessed August 20, 2016.
  4. Sebastião E, Ibe-Lamberts K, Bobitt J, Schwingel, A, Chodzko-Zajko W. Employing a participatory research approach to explore physical activity among older African American women. J Aging Res 2014;2014:941019. doi: 10.1155/2014/941019. [Crossref]
  5. Cozier YC, Yu J, Coogan PF, Bethea TN, Rosenberg L, Palmer JR. Racism, segregation, and risk of obesity in the Black Women’s Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2014;179(7): 875–83. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu004. [Crossref]
  6. Lynch EB, Kane J. Body size perception among African American women. J Nutr Educ Behav 2014;6(5):412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.03.002. [Crossref]
  7. Mama SK, Quill BE, Fernandez-Esquer ME, Reese-Smith JY, Banda JA, Lee RE. Body image and physical activity among Latina and African American women. Ethn Dis 2011;21(3):281-7.
  8. Whitt‐Glover MC, Keith NR, Ceaser TG, Virgil K, Ledford L, Hasson RE. A systematic review of physical activity interventions among African American adults: evidence from 2009 to 2013. Obes Rev 2014;15(S4):125-45. doi: 10.1111/obr.12205. [Crossref]
  9. Pekmezi D, Marcus B, Meneses K, Baskin ML, Ard JD, Martin MY, et al. Developing an intervention to address physical activity barriers for African–American women in the deep south (USA). J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013;9(3):301-12. doi: 10.2217/whe.13.20. [Crossref]
  10. Harvey IS, Story CR, Knutson D, Whitt-Glover MC. Exploring the relationship of religiosity, religious support, and social support among African American women in a physical activity intervention program. J Relig Health 2016;55(2):495-509. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0017-6. [Crossref]
  11. Sharma M, Sargent L, Stacy R. Predictors of leisure-time physical activity among African American women. Am J Health Behav 2005;29(4):352-9.
  12. Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, Andersen LB, Owen N, Goenka S, et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet 2012;380(9838):272-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60816-2. [Crossref]
  13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(4):W65-94.
  14. Zoellner J, Powers A, Avis-Williams A, Ndirangu M, Strickland E, Yadrick K. Compliance and acceptability of maintaining a 6-month pedometer diary in a rural, African American community-based walking intervention. J Phys Act Health 2009;6(4):475-82.
  15. Zoellner J, Connell C, Powers A, Avis-Williams A, Yadrick K, Bogle ML. Does a six-month pedometer intervention improve physical activity and health among vulnerable African Americans? A feasibility study. J Phys Act Health 2010; 7(2):224-31.
  16. Ingram D, Wilbur J, McDevitt J, Buchholz S. Women’s walking program for African American women: Expectations and recommendations from participants as experts. Women Health 2011;51(6):566-82. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2011.606357. [Crossref]
  17. Oh AY, Zenk SN, Wilbur J, Block R, McDevitt J, Wang E. Effects of perceived and objective neighborhood crime on walking frequency among midlife African American women in a home-based walking intervention. J Phys Act Health 2010;7(4):432-41.
  18. Wilbur J, Zenk S, Wang E, Oh A, McDevitt J, Block D, et al. Neighborhood characteristics, adherence to walking, and depressive symptoms in midlife African American women. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009;18(8):1201-10. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1168. [Crossref]
  19. Duru OK, Sarkisian CA, Leng M, Mangione CM. Sisters in motion: a randomized controlled trial of a faith‐based physical activity intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58(10):1863-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03082.x. [Crossref]
  20. Peterson JA, Cheng AL. Heart and soul physical activity program for African American women. West J Nurs Res 2011;33(5):652-70. doi: 10.1177/0193945910383706. [Crossref]
  21. Whitt-Glover MC, Goldmon MV, Karanja N, Heil DP, Gizlice Z. Learning and Developing Individual Exercise Skills (LADIES) for a better life: a physical activity intervention for black women. Contemp Clin Trials 2012;33(6):1159-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.08.003. [Crossref]
  22. Rimmer JH, Rauworth A, Wang E, Heckerling PS, Gerber BS. A randomized controlled trial to increase physical activity and reduce obesity in a predominantly African American group of women with mobility disabilities and severe obesity. Prev Med 2009;48(5):473-9.
  23. Rimmer JH, Hsieh K, Graham BC, Gerber BS, Gray-Stanley JA. Barrier removal in increasing physical activity levels in obese African American women with disabilities. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010;19(10):1869-76. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.1941. [Crossref]
  24. Johnson LT, Ralston PA, Jones E. Beauty salon health intervention increases fruit and vegetable consumption in African-American women. J Am Diet Assoc 2010;110(6):941-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.03.012. [Crossref]
  25. Joseph RP, Casazza K, Durant NH. The effect of a 3-month moderate-intensity physical activity program on body composition in overweight and obese African American college females. Osteoporos Int 2014;25(10):2485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2825-z. [Crossref]
  26. Scarinci IC, Moore A, Wynn-Wallace T, Cherrington A, Fouad M, Li Y. A community-based, culturally relevant intervention to promote healthy eating and physical activity among middle-aged African American women in rural Alabama: findings from a group randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2014;69:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.016. [Crossref]
  27. Parra-Medina D, Wilcox S, Salinas J, Addy C, Fore E, Poston M, et al. Results of the heart healthy and ethnically relevant lifestyle trial: a cardiovascular risk reduction intervention for african american women attending community health centers. Am J Public Health 2011;101(10):1914-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300151. [Crossref]
Submitted: 09 Jan 2016
Revised: 28 Oct 2016
Accepted: 31 Oct 2016
First published online: 05 Mar 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

Abstract View: 2904
PDF Download: 1772
Full Text View: 1073