Logo-hpp
2024: Two-year Impact Factor: 2.8
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2024):6.1
 
Platinum
Open Access

Health Promot Perspect. 2025;15(4): 333-342.
doi: 10.34172/hpp.025.44995
  Abstract View: 34
  PDF Download: 13

Scoping Review

Clinical decision-making frameworks for pandemic preparedness and response: A scoping review

Farhad Sattar Mohammed 1 ORCID logo, Kaveh Bahmanpour 2* ORCID logo, Sina Valiee 3 ORCID logo, Adel Fatemi 4 ORCID logo

1 Department of Health Care Management, School of Medical Sciences and Technologies, S R.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Nursing, School of Medical Sciences, Sa.C., Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
3 Clinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
4 Department of Statistics, School of Basic Sciences, Sa.C., Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Kaveh Bahmanpour, Email: kaveh.bahmanpour@iau.ac.ir

Abstract

Background: Pandemic management demands a multifaceted strategy that integrates disease transmission control, resource allocation, and effective public health interventions. This study explores how combining clinical decision-making frameworks (CDMFs) can improve decision-making and adaptive strategies during public health emergencies. The goal is to provide a synergistic approach that enhances the speed, effectiveness, and equity of pandemic responses.

Methods: We conducted a review of literature published up to January 2025 to evaluate the contributions and limitations of these frameworks in pandemic preparedness and response. The review emphasizes how each framework supports adaptability, risk identification, and strategic planning, while also addressing challenges related to equity and data quality.

Results: The SOAR framework fosters adaptability and creativity, while risk assessment provides a systematic method for threat identification and mitigation. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven decision support system (DSS) leverage machine learning and predictive analytics to provide immediate insights and improve strategic planning, although issues of data quality and equity must be addressed. The DECIDE framework ensures comprehensive decision-making, balancing strategic planning with the urgency of a crisis. The review highlights the potential of AI to improve decision-making efficiency, while underscoring the need for careful oversight to maintain transparency and prevent the perpetuation of health inequalities.

Conclusion: Integrating AI into CDMFs offers significant opportunities to improve future pandemic responses. Evolving these frameworks and incorporating AI-DSS, while carefully addressing ethical considerations and data quality, will lead to more scientifically sound, practical, and equitable solutions to global health problems, enhancing overall pandemic preparedness and resilience.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 35

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 13

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Submitted: 03 Aug 2025
Revision: 09 Aug 2025
Accepted: 10 Aug 2025
ePublished: 30 Dec 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)