Logo-hpp
2025: Two-year Impact Factor: 4.4
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2025):5.1
 
Platinum
Open Access

Health Promot Perspect. 2026;16(3): 352-367.
doi: 10.34172/hpp.44928
  Abstract View: 15
  PDF Download: 4

Review Article

Exoskeleton Interactions in Industrial Work Tasks: A Scoping Review of Applications, Evaluation Methods, and Challenges

Abdollah Vahedi 1 ORCID logo, Iman Dianat 2* ORCID logo, Héctor Ignacio Castellucci 3

1 School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Occupational Health & Ergonomics, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Centro de Estudio del Trabajo y Factores Humanos, Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
*Corresponding Author: Iman Dianat, Email: dianati@tbzmed.ac.ir

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal symptoms are a major occupational health concern worldwide, contributing to increased sickness absence, reduced work capacity, and substantial healthcare and economic costs. Wearable exoskeletons are increasingly used in industrial work to reduce musculoskeletal strain and support physically demanding tasks. The aim of this study was to review the user-exoskeleton interactions while performing industrial work tasks.

Methods: The relevant journal papers published between 2009 and 2024 from SciVerse Scopus and PubMed were extracted, following the PRISMA guidelines. The focus was on applications, evaluation methods, outcomes, and design challenges.

Results: One hundred and fifty-five papers included in the review. Fifty-two different industrial exoskeletons were identified (20 active and 32 passive exoskeletons), which were mainly evaluated in manual lifting/lowering (56%), overhead (29%), and assembly (6%) tasks. The exoskeletons were generally aimed to support the back (51%) and arms (21%). The exoskeletons decreased muscle activity levels (9–81%) and physiological strain (oxygen consumption and heart rate) as well as perceived exertion and discomfort experience, although they had negative consequences in terms of balance control and stability, working postures, and joint range of motion. The effects of exoskeletons on muscle fatigue, musculoskeletal/biomechanical loading and performance measures were contradictory. Most studies were short-duration lab trials, limiting generalizability to real workplaces. Key challenges include lack of standardized evaluation protocols, limited field validation, and potential for unintended biomechanical effects.

Conclusion: Findings support the need for harmonized testing methods, longer field trials, and user-centered designs to ensure safe and effective implementation in industrial settings.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 16

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 4

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Submitted: 15 Jul 2025
Revision: 22 May 2026
Accepted: 13 Jun 2026
ePublished: 05 Nov 2026
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)