Logo-hpp
2024: Two-year Impact Factor: 2.8
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2024):6.1
 
Platinum
Open Access

Health Promot Perspect. 2025;15(4): 370-383.
doi: 10.34172/hpp.025.44366
  Abstract View: 13
  PDF Download: 14

Original Article

Visitor responses to emergency evacuation: A human behavior approach

Omid Akbarzadeh 1 ORCID logo, Parisa Moshashaei 2, Hamed Golzad 2* ORCID logo, Henry Liu 2, Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh 1

1 Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 School of Built Environment and Design, Faculty of Art and Design, University of Canberra, Canberra 2617, Australia
*Corresponding Author: Hamed Golzad, Email: Hamed.golzad@canberra.edu.au

Abstract

Background: This study investigates human behaviours during emergency evacuations using data collected at the Tabriz Grand Bazaar (TGB), a UNESCO World Heritage site and the world’s largest covered market. While past studies modelled crowd evacuations through simulations, limited empirical research exists on real human behaviour.

Methods: Drawing on 749 questionnaire responses from TGB visitors, the study explores four key aspects of evacuation dynamics: (1) proactive vs. reactive responses; (2) competitive vs. cooperative interactions; (3) symmetry-breaking behaviours; and (4) route selection.

Results: The analysis revealed that 44.2% of participants reported engaging in competitive behaviours (e.g., pushing), while only 8.4% showed a strong willingness to help others. Over 90% tended to follow others during evacuations, and 77.8% preferred to avoid the least crowded exit, indicating high symmetry-breaking tendencies. No significant correlation was found between gender and evacuation behaviours, but marital status, education, and age were significantly associated with different behavioural strategies.

Conclusion: The study contributes by (1) providing behavioural insights for emergency planning, (2) informing the design of realistic evacuation simulations, and (3) offering empirical evidence to support future research.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 14

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 14

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Submitted: 15 Feb 2025
Revision: 07 Jul 2025
Accepted: 11 Aug 2025
ePublished: 30 Dec 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)