Logo-hpp
2024: Two-year Impact Factor: 2.8
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2024):6.1
 
Platinum
Open Access

Health Promot Perspect. 2025;15(2): 98-109.
doi: 10.34172/hpp.025.43894
  Abstract View: 15
  PDF Download: 13

Systematic Review

Protein intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: A dose–response and pairwise meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Mohaddeseh Badpeyma 1,2 ORCID logo, Faezeh Ghalichi 3, Roghayeh Molani-Gol 1,2, Hamed Valizadeh 4, Yousef Javadzadeh 5, Ahmadreza Rasouli 1,2, Mohammad Alizadeh 1* ORCID logo, Sorayya Kheirouri 1* ORCID logo

1 Department of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran
4 Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
5 Biotechnology Research Center and Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Authors: Mohammad Alizadeh, Email: mdalizadeh@tbzmed.ac.ir; Sorayya Kheirouri, Email: Kheirouris@tbzmed.ac.ir

Abstract

Background: The optimal protein intake for critically ill patients remains uncertain. This systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of high-protein nutritional support on clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing high- versus low-protein nutrition in critically ill adults with similar energy intake were identified through PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (up to June 2023). A random-effects model was used to pool risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Linear and non-linear trends were assessed using the one-stage cubic spline regression model.

Results: Twenty-three RCTs were included. The summary RR was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.64–1.08; I2=63.6%; n=17) for mortality and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.88–1.25; I2=0%; n=7) for infections. The summary MD was -0.23% (-0.76 to 0.29, I2=5.6%, n=14) for mechanical ventilation days, -0.40 (-1.11 to 0.32, I2=0%, n=17) for ICU days, 0.73 (-1.11 to 2.58, I2=6%, n=10) for hospital days, and -3.44 (-4.99 to -1.90; I2=16.4%; n=5) for muscle atrophy. There was no evidence of linear or nonlinear trends.

Conclusion: Although higher protein intake had no significant effect on mortality or length of stay, it was associated with reduced muscle wasting. This suggests a potential role in preserving lean mass and supporting long-term functional recovery.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024480303.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 16

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 13

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 08 Dec 2024
Revision: 28 Jan 2025
Accepted: 04 Feb 2025
ePublished: 15 Jul 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)