Logo-hpp
2023: Two-year Impact Factor: 2.4
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2023):7.1
 
Platinum
Open Access

Health Promot Perspect. 2024;14(3): 221-237.
doi: 10.34172/hpp.42899
  Abstract View: 97
  PDF Download: 129

Scoping Review

Scoping review meets expert interviews: Key issues of multimodal programs for workplace health promotion in long-term care facilities – “We can’t just run a standard program”

Judith Czakert 1* ORCID logo, Anne Schirmaier 1 ORCID logo, Sarah B. Blakeslee 1 ORCID logo, Wiebke Stritter 1 ORCID logo, Anna K. Koch 1 ORCID logo, Christian Kessler 2,3 ORCID logo, Georg Seifert 1,4 ORCID logo

1 Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humbold-Universität zu Berlin, Charité Competence Center for Traditional and Integrative Medicine (CCCTIM), Berlin, Germany
2 Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humbold-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economy, Berlin, Germany
3 Department of Internal and Nature-Based Therapies, Immanuel Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
4 Clinical Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
*Corresponding Author: Judith Czakert, Email: judith.czakert@charite.de

Abstract

Background: Long-term care facility employees’ workload escalation intensifies negative risk for (nursing) staff health, residents, and the economy. Workplace health promotion (WHP) has emerged as a vital approach with positive impacts on employee well-being. This Scoping Review focuses on multimodal WHP programs in long-term care facilities, emphasizing barriers, facilitators, and the integration of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM).

Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search strategy from February to April 2023 in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) yielded 506 hits. Findings were enriched through semi-structured expert interviews. All data were analyzed with a deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis.

Results: Eleven publications met inclusion criteria and eight experts were interviewed based on key topics of the included publications. The integration of the results showed that primary obstacles highlight structural challenges (time, finances, hierarchies) and team dynamics (lack of support, communication issues, low motivation), while effective communication, support from the management, and participatory engagement enhance program success. CIM approaches are not explicitly referenced as such, despite widespread use.

Conclusion: An exclusive CIM-focus, with multimodal WHP programs for long-term care facilities is missing and should highlight the necessity of a multimethod approach intervention. While the need for further research about the specific topic of multimodal, CIM-based WHO programs in long-term care facilities – including cross-cultural and international comparisons – is apparent, an appropriate evaluation of complex interventions is challenging given the nature of multimodal WHP programs. A multi-method approach is therefore recommended as standard for further research in this area.

First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 98

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 129

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 07 Feb 2024
Accepted: 07 May 2024
ePublished: 31 Oct 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)