Logo-hpp
2023: Two-year Impact Factor: 2.4
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2023):7.1
 
Platinum
Open Access

Health Promot Perspect. 2024;14(2): 148-160.
doi: 10.34172/hpp.42548
PMID: 39291047
PMCID: PMC11403339
  Abstract View: 314
  PDF Download: 310

Original Article

Intervening to reduce sedentary behavior among African American elders: the “Stand Up and Move More” intervention

Brianna N. Leitzelar 1,2* ORCID logo, Neda E. Almassi 1, Susan J. Andreae 1, Rachelle Winkle-Wagner 3, Lisa Cadmus-Bertram 1, Luis Columna 1, Kevin M. Crombie 1, Kelli F. Koltyn 1

1 Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
2 Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA
3 Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
*Corresponding Author: Brianna N. Leitzelar, Email: bleitzel@wakehealth.edu

Abstract

Background: Reducing sedentary behavior is a promising intervention target for improving health for older adults; however, few interventions include African American communities. The purpose of this research was to extend the reach of an effective sedentary behavior intervention to African American elders.

Methods: Two pilot studies assessed the feasibility (retention, adherence, and safety) and acceptability (participant and leader perspectives) of a 4-wk “Stand Up and Move More” (SUMM) intervention. Sedentary behavior (self-reported and monitor-derived), function (short physical performance battery), and quality of life (SF-36) were measured at baseline (wk0), postintervention (wk4), and follow up (wk12; study 1) to examine preliminary effectiveness of the intervention. Participants (N=26) attended SUMM or an attention-matched stress management intervention (study 2). The magnitude of treatment effects were determined using Hedge’s g effect size calculations [small (g=0.20 to 0.49), moderate (g=0.50 to 0.79), large (g>0.80)].

Results: Retention and adherence rates ranged from 50%-100% and 80%-100%, respectively. There were no adverse events. Participants expressed high satisfaction, and the leader of the SUMM intervention indicated that the intervention content was beneficial. Hedges’ g revealed negligible to small changes in sedentary behavior (g<0.50) following SUMM. There were moderate to large improvements in function (g=0.51-0.82) and quality of life (g=0.54-1.07) from wk0 to wk4 in study 1; and moderate to large improvements in function (g=0.51-0.88) from wk0 to wk4 in study 2. There was a moderate improvement in quality of life (SF-36 emotional role limitations g=0.54) in the SUMM group only.

Conclusion: Given its feasibility, safety, and acceptability, SUMM may be a promising intervention to improve functioning and well-being among African American elders.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 315

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 310

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 26 Sep 2023
Accepted: 01 Mar 2024
ePublished: 29 Jul 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)