Logo-hpp
2022: Two-year Impact Factor: 4.4
Scopus Journal Metrics
CiteScore (2022): 5.3
SNIP(2022):1.389
SJR(2022): 0.78
Platinum
Open Access

Health Promot Perspect. 2023;13(2): 88-98.
doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.11
PMID: 37600548
PMCID: PMC10439457
  Abstract View: 583
  PDF Download: 399
  Full Text View: 106

Review

FANTASTIC lifestyle questionnaire from 1983 until 2022: A review

Patrícia Batista 1* ORCID logo, João Neves-Amado 2, Anabela Pereira 3, João Amado 4

1 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Research Centre for Human Development (CEDH), Human Neurobehavioral Laboratory (HNL), Porto, Portuga
2 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Institute of Health Sciences (ICS), Porto, Portugal
3 University of Évora, Center for Research in Education and Psychology, Évora, Portugal
4 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Porto, Portugal
*Corresponding Author: Patrícia Batista, Email: pbatista@ucp.pt

Abstract

Background: Studying lifestyles has always been important; quantifying them has become more complex. However, a questionnaire produced in 1983 has shown that its simple form of evaluation can be an added value in understanding lifestyles. Our aim is a systematic review of the scientific literature about the use of the FANTASTIC Lifestyle questionnaire (FLQ).

Methods: The reflective systematic literature review on PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, and SCIELO databases with the descriptors “FANTASTIC Lifestyle questionnaire” OR “FANTASTICO questionnaire” OR “FANTASTIC questionnaire” OR “FANTASTIC survey” OR “FANTASTIC checklist”. PRISMA criteria reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were applied. The inclusion criteria were the use of FLQ instrument to measure lifestyles, presenting quantitative or qualitative results, and psychometric studies. It excluded other lifestyle instruments, incomplete articles, and non-English, Brazilian, Spanish, and Portuguese language articles.

Results: Findings reveal 41 scientific articles included in the study. It analyzed the results and most studies use the instrument to assess all dimensions. However, some studies reported assessing specific dimensions such as nutrition, sleep, stress, tobacco, alcohol, and drugs. The questionnaire has been applied to a wide range of ages and literacy levels.

Conclusion: This literature review allowed us to conclude that this questionnaire is still in use today and is applied in several contexts and populations. It is also possible to verify the relevance of its use and to design intervention strategies and programs for a healthy society. It is essential to draw attention to this issue and promote health literacy (HL) on this topic.

First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 565

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 399

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 106

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 29 Nov 2022
Revision: 18 Jan 2023
Accepted: 21 Jan 2023
ePublished: 10 Jul 2023
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)