Health Promot Perspect. 2017;7(4): 216-222.
doi: 10.15171/hpp.2017.38
PMID: 29085799
PMCID: PMC5647357
  Abstract View: 1568
  PDF Download: 1252
  Full Text View: 462

Original Article

The metabolic equivalents of one-mile walking by older adults; implications for health promotion

Mandy Lucinda Gault 1*, Mark Elisabeth Theodorus Willems 1 ORCID logo

1 Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Chichester, College Lane, Chichester, UK


Background: Instructions for older adults regarding the intensity of walking may not elicit an intensity to infer health gains. We recorded the metabolic equivalents (METs) during a 1-mile walk using constant and predicted values of resting MET in older adults to establish walking guidelines for health promotion and participation.Methods: In a cross-sectional design study, participants (15 men, 10 women) walked 1-mile over ground, in a wooden floored gymnasium, wearing the Cosmed K4b2 for measurement of energy expenditure. Constant or predicted values for resting MET were used to calculate the number of 1-mile walks to meet 450-750 MET∙min∙wk-1.Results: Participants had MET values higher than 3 for both methods, with 29% and 64% of the participants higher than 6 for a constant and predicted MET value, respectively. The METs of the1-mile walk were (mean ± SD) 6 ± 1 and 7 ± 1 METs using constant and predicted resting MET,and similar for men (constant: 6 ± 1 METs; predicted: 7 ± 1 METs) and women (constant: 5±1METs; predicted: 6 ± 1 METs) (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Older adults that are instructed to walk 1-mile at a fast and constant pace meet the minimum required intensity for physical activity, and public health guidelines. Health professionals, that administer exercise, could encourage older adults to accumulate between six and nine 1-mile walks per week for health gains.
Keywords: One-mile walk, Metabolic equivalent, Health promotion, Aging
Citation: Gault ML, Willems MET. The metabolic equivalents of one-mile walking by older adults; implications for health promotion. Health Promot Perspect. 2017;7(4):216-222. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2017.38.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Security code

Abstract View: 1569

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 1252

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Full Text View: 462

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 22 Aug 2017
Revision: 15 Sep 2017
Accepted: 15 Sep 2017
ePublished: 15 Sep 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)