﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Health Promotion Perspectives</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2228-6497</Issn>
      <Volume>16</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <DAY>05</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>The Readiness Reading Matrix (RRM) for Evaluating Care Pathways in Italy: A Perspective</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>284</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>289</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.34172/hpp.48259</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Roberto</FirstName>
        <LastName>Papa</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5212-7394</Identifier>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.34172/hpp.48259</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>10</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>06</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Care pathways (CPs)—formally defined in Italy as Percorsi Diagnostico-Terapeutici Assistenziali (PDTA)—have long been a cornerstone of Italy’s community-based healthcare reorganisation. Defined by the European Pathway Association as complex interventions for shared decision-making and the organisation of care for a defined patient group, CPs remain vulnerable to a systematic gap between potential and actual performance. This Perspective proposes the Readiness Reading Matrix (RRM), a logical framework intersecting Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome triad with four readiness domains: interprofessional collaboration, lean standardisation, care continuity, and technological maturity, featuring patient co-design as a transversal axis. The RRM situates three previously disconnected international references—the Healthcare Readiness Index, the Telemedicine Readiness Inventory for Facilities, and the WHO’s SARA tool—within a single conceptual architecture. This approach offers a systemic, rather than merely comparative, evaluation of health-system readiness. The framework is presented here as a reference architecture pending empirical validation, and is illustrated through an applied scenario.</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Delivery of health care</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Integrated</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Health promotion</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Patient participation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Public health</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Quality indicators</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>