Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Health Promotion Perspectives 2228-6497 16 2 2026 08 21 A Scoping Review of Health Education Programs for Improving Men’s Engagement with Health Services 134 152 10.34172/hpp.45321 EN Jalil Hosseini https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3741-1543 Keshvar Samadaee Gelehkolaee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9692-187X Sakineh Hajebrahimi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1494-7097 Samira Shariatpanahi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9893-4121 Fateme Tahmasbi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0652-7693 Neda Kabiri https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7224-9583 Jiri Kantor Hadi Mostafaei https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5596-1771 Abtin Heidarzadeh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9360-2961 Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9030-2106 Journal Article 10.34172/hpp.45321 2025 10 13 2026 01 02 Introduction: To map and synthesize evidence from health education programs (HEPs) aimed at improving men’s engagement with health services, including original studies, community programs, and clinical guidelines. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR, we conducted a comprehensive search of databases and guideline repositories to identify (1) health education programs, (2) original studies evaluating HEPs, and (3) clinical guidelines related to men’s health. Data were synthesized thematically across these evidence streams. Results: Ninety-two sources were included (30 programs, 39 primary studies, 23 guidelines). Effective HEPs commonly used gender-sensitive messaging, decision aids, peer- or community-based delivery, and digital platforms. Programs situated in male-centric environments (sports clubs, barbershops, workplaces) demonstrated high acceptability and engagement. Guidelines consistently emphasized routine screening, particularly for prostate cancer, and lifestyle interventions such as physical activity and smoking cessation. Conclusion: Across diverse evidence types, HEPs that are culturally tailored, gender-sensitive, and delivered in male-friendly settings are most effective in increasing men’s engagement with health services. Strong emphasis on prostate cancer screening in existing evidence highlights the need for broader attention to other prevalent male health issues.