﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Health Promotion Perspectives</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2228-6497</Issn>
      <Volume>8</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <DAY>07</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>The influence of common method bias on the relationship of the socio-ecological model in predicting physical activity behavior</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>41</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>45</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.15171/hpp.2018.05</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Savanna</FirstName>
        <LastName>Wingate</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Eveleen</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sng</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Paul D.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Loprinzi</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.15171/hpp.2018.05</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>11</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent, if any, that the association between socio-ecological parameters and physical activity may be influenced by common method bias (CMB).Methods: This study took place between February and May of 2017 at a Southeastern University in the United States. A randomized controlled experiment was employed among 119 young adults.Participants were randomized into either group 1 (the group we attempted to minimize CMB)or group 2 (control group). In group 1, CMB was minimized via various procedural remedies,such as separating the measurement of predictor and criterion variables by introducing a time lag (temporal; 2 visits several days apart), creating a cover story (psychological), and approximating measures to have data collected in different media (computer-based vs. paper and pencil) and different locations to control method variance when collecting self-report measures from the same source. Socio-ecological parameters (self-efficacy; friend support; family support)and physical activity were self-reported.Results: Exercise self-efficacy was significantly associated with physical activity. This association(β = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.33-1.1; P = 0.001) was only observed in group 2 (control), but not in group 1 (experimental group) (β = 0.03; 95% CI: -0.57-0.63; P = 0.91). The difference in these coefficients (i.e., β = 0.74 vs. β = 0.03) was statistically significant (P = 0.04).Conclusion: Future research in this field, when feasible, may wish to consider employing procedural and statistical remedies to minimize CMB.</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Exercise psychology</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Inflation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Self-efficacy</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>